Answer:

Introduction:

The engineering graduate faces an ethical dilemma of whether to prioritize her job security or the well-being of downstream villagers affected by toxic waste discharge. She must weigh the potential consequences and make a decision that aligns with her moral values and responsibilities.

Body:

(a) Keeping quiet in this situation is not morally right for several reasons:

1.  Duty to protect others: As a responsible human being, we have a duty to protect the well-being and safety of others. By staying silent, she is allowing the toxic waste to harm the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. Remaining silent would be a violation of her moral obligation to help those in need.
2.  Ethical implications: Discharging highly toxic waste into a river, knowingly causing harm to innocent people, is an unethical act. By keeping quiet, she becomes complicit in the company’s harmful actions. This goes against basic principles of integrity, honesty, and compassion.
3.  Long-term consequences: Ignoring the issue and allowing the toxic waste discharge to continue will have long-term consequences for the environment and the community. The pollution may escalate, causing irreversible damage to the ecosystem and affecting the livelihoods of the villagers. By speaking up, she has the opportunity to prevent further harm and protect the long-term interests of both the community and the environment.

(b) The course of action she should consider taking:

1.  Gather evidence: Before taking any action, she should gather sufficient evidence to substantiate her claims. This may include photographs, documents, or any other relevant information that can prove the illegal discharge of toxic waste. This will help her present a compelling case.
2.  Document the issue anonymously: To protect her job and identity, she can anonymously report the issue to the appropriate regulatory authorities, environmental organizations, or media outlets. By documenting the problem, she ensures that it is brought to public attention, increasing the chances of action being taken without jeopardizing her livelihood.
3.  Seek legal advice and protection: Consulting with a lawyer who specializes in environmental law can provide her with guidance on her legal rights and protections. They can advise on the appropriate channels to report the issue and how to safeguard herself from any potential retaliation.
4.  Whistleblower protection: Research if there are any laws or regulations in place that protect whistleblowers in her country. If such protections exist, she can use them to shield herself from unjust consequences for exposing the wrongdoing.
5.  Raise awareness internally: If she feels comfortable and safe doing so, she can try to raise awareness about the issue within the company by discussing it with trusted colleagues who may be sympathetic to the cause. This could potentially pressure the management to address the problem and rectify their practices.
6.  Support from external organizations: Contacting relevant environmental organizations or NGOs who work in the field of pollution control and community welfare can provide her with additional support, advice, and potential avenues for action.

Conclusion:

It is crucial for her to prioritize her safety and livelihood while taking steps to expose the issue. By following these suggestions, she can work towards rectifying the problem while minimizing the risk to herself and her family.

DOWNLOAD PDF