Answer: 

Introduction:

The government’s schemes intended to uplift vulnerable and backward communities are typically designed to ensure social justice and bridge the gap between different sections of society. These schemes often involve reservations in education and jobs, financial assistance, skill development programs, and access to social resources like housing, healthcare, and sanitation.

Body:

However, the way these schemes are implemented can sometimes have unintended consequences, such as their exclusion from urban economies, particularly in terms of business establishment.

• Limited Scope of Schemes:
  • Many government schemes target rural populations, with less focus on supporting these communities in urban settings.
  • For instance, while schemes like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) or Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Gramin (PMAY-G) provide employment and housing in rural areas, they do not necessarily facilitate the transition to urban economies or the establishment of businesses in urban areas.
• Lack of Relevant Skills:
  • Some schemes provide skill development for traditional or rural-centric vocations but lack the necessary training for skills relevant to urban economies.
  • As a result, members of these communities might find it difficult to start businesses in urban settings that require different skill sets.
• Access to Capital:
  • Despite schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) or Stand Up India, which aim to provide loans for starting businesses, many marginalized individuals still struggle with access to capital.
  • These schemes often require formal banking access, financial literacy, and collateral, which can be challenging for these communities.
• Social Discrimination:
  • Social discrimination remains a major hurdle.
  • Even in urban settings, people from backward communities often face discrimination, which can deter them from establishing businesses or can limit their customer base.

However, it is important to note that not all government schemes lead to exclusion in urban economies. There are schemes like the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM) that specifically aim to reduce poverty and vulnerability in urban areas by providing skill training, supporting self-employment, and offering subsidized loans.

Conclusion:

To ensure these schemes effectively support these communities in urban settings, there needs to be a more targeted approach that considers the unique challenges and opportunities in urban economies.

DOWNLOAD PDF