Answer: 

Introduction:

The New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921 was introduced by Vladimir Lenin in the Soviet Union as a response to the economic crisis resulting from the Russian Civil War. The policy aimed to revive the economy through a mix of socialism and capitalism. After India gained independence in 1947, it adopted a series of economic policies that sought to promote economic growth and self-reliance.

Body:

Similarities between the NEP and India’s economic policies:

• Mixed economy: Both the NEP and India’s economic policies aimed to create a mixed economy, combining elements of socialism and capitalism.
• State control: In both cases, the state controlled key industries and infrastructure, such as railways, energy, and heavy industries.
• Focus on industrialization: Both the NEP and India’s economic policies placed a strong emphasis on industrialization as a means of achieving economic development and self-reliance.

Differences between the NEP and India’s economic policies:

• Role of the private sector: While the NEP allowed for some private enterprise, it was limited in scope and tightly controlled. In contrast, India’s economic policies provided more room for private sector growth and encouraged entrepreneurship.
• Commitment to democracy: India’s economic policies were framed within the context of a democratic political system, unlike the Soviet Union’s authoritarian regime. This influenced the nature of policy-making, with greater emphasis on consensus-building and addressing the needs of diverse constituencies.
• Influence of other economic models: India’s economic policies were not solely influenced by the NEP; they also drew inspiration from other models, such as the British Fabian socialism and the development experiences of other newly-independent countries.

Conclusion:

The NEP may have provided a framework for a mixed economy that allowed India to pursue its goals of economic development and self-reliance. However, India’s unique political, social, and economic context played a significant role in shaping its policies, making it difficult to attribute the influence solely to the NEP.

DOWNLOAD PDF