//php print_r(get_the_ID()); ?>
PWOnlyIAS September 19, 2024 03:28 6111 0
Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 are crucial for understanding India's legal landscape. Analyze Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 to stay updated.
Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024: The UPSC Civil Services Examination is a difficult and hard-to-crack examination, where aspirants must be well-versed in law and justice. All the candidates must understand that Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 can play a significant role in securing high marks. These judgements shape and redefine India’s socioeconomic and political landscape, so aspirants need to cover such topics for their UPSC Exam.
In this well-structured guide, we will overview the Important Supreme Court cases 2024, and explore the Landmark Supreme Court judgements that have significantly impacted the nation.
This analysis will help the candidates understand how Supreme Court rulings for UPSC can be incorporated into their answers for various papers in the UPSC Mains examination.
The Supreme Court of India delivered many critical judgements that have far-reaching implications on constitutional law, governance, and social justice. These Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 influence the legal framework and provide significant insights for UPSC aspirants. Acknowledging these rulings is essential for aspirants, as it is a crucial part of current affairs and legal studies. Here are some of the most important Supreme Court decisions:
Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 | ||
Case Name | Issue | Judgement |
Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) | Constitutional Validity of the Sedition Law: The case questioned whether the sedition law (Section 124A IPC) violates free speech. | The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the sedition law but underlined that its application must be limited to cases where speech instigates violence or threat to public order. |
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) | Right to Privacy and Data Protection: Concerns about privacy due to digitization and Aadhaar data collection. | The court restated privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 and directed the government to establish a robust data protection framework to prevent misuse and unauthorized access to personal information. |
Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) Recommendations (2022) | Environmental Conservation: The impact of developmental activities on the ecological balance of the Western Ghats. | The Supreme Court mandated compliance with the WGEEP recommendations, prohibiting environmentally damaging activities in sensitive areas, and emphasizing sustainable development practices. |
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022) | EWS Quota and Reservation Policies: Examination of the constitutional validity of the 10% EWS reservation in education and jobs. | The court upheld the EWS quota, recognizing economic criteria for reservation, while maintaining that it must adhere to the 50% reservation cap, and stressed the need for periodic policy reviews to ensure social justice. |
Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India (2018) | Electoral Reforms and Decriminalization of Politics: Addressing the issue of criminal candidates contesting elections. | The court directed the Election Commission to ensure political parties disclose the criminal records of candidates and justify their selection, promoting transparency and accountability in elections to combat the criminalization of politics. |
Vidhya Devi V. The State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) | Right against deprivation of property | SC stated that Right to property is both a human right and a constitutional right – the latter under Article 300A of the Constitution. |
S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India (2022) | Constitutional Validity of Section 124A of IPC | Orderd governments to refrain from registering any FIR under section 124A of the IPC. Ensured balance between Civil liberties and the security of the state. |
Electoral Bonds Scheme case (2024) | Validity of Electoral Bonds Scheme | Struck down the electoral bond scheme, calling it unconstitutional. |
In addition to the recent Supreme Court rulings for UPSC, aspirants must recognize some Landmark Supreme Court judgements that had a profound impact on India’s legal and social fabric. These cases often appear in UPSC Mains as they demonstrate the evolution of constitutional jurisprudence and the role of the judiciary in shaping modern India.
Landmark Supreme Court Judgements | ||
Case Name | Issue | Judgement |
Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras (1950) | Freedom of Speech and Expression: Challenge to the ban on entry, circulation, and sale of a magazine. | The Supreme Court ruled that freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), laying the foundation for the free press and emphasizing its democratic significance. |
Berubari Union Case (1960) | Territorial Integrity and Amendment Powers: Exchange of territory between India and Pakistan. | The Court held that ceding Indian territory requires a constitutional amendment under Article 368, reinforcing parliamentary procedures for territorial changes. |
Golaknath Case (1967) | Amendability of Fundamental Rights: Whether Parliament can amend fundamental rights. | The Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights are unamendable, emphasizing that Parliament cannot abridge or abrogate these rights, thus asserting their inviolable nature. |
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) | Basic Structure Doctrine: Limits on Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution. | Established the Basic Structure Doctrine, declaring certain core constitutional features as unamendable, ensuring the protection of India’s constitutional framework and democracy. |
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) | Right to Life and Personal Liberty: Validity of arbitrary passport seizure. | Expanded the interpretation of Article 21, asserting that any law affecting personal liberty must be fair, just, and reasonable, thereby strengthening procedural safeguards. |
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985) | Right to Maintenance: Muslim woman’s right to maintenance post-divorce under Section 125 CrPC. | The Supreme Court upheld a Muslim woman’s right to maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, emphasizing secularism and gender equality in personal laws. |
D C Wadhwa and Others v. State of Bihar (1986) | Ordinance Raj: Abuse of legislative powers through re-promulgation of ordinances. | The Court declared that the re-promulgation of ordinances is unconstitutional, reinforcing the principles of legislative accountability and the separation of powers. |
Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 PDF Download |
Click Here |
The Analysis of recent Supreme Court judgements highlights several trends that are essential for UPSC Mains 2024 preparation:
The Impact of Supreme Court decisions expands beyond legal implications, which influence the policy formulation, governance, and societal norms.
Including Important Supreme Court cases 2024 and Landmark Supreme Court judgements in your UPSC preparation can significantly enhance the quality of your answer writing. Here are some tips provided for effective preparation:
In Conclusion, Recent Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC Mains 2024 provide valuable insights into law, governance, and society. Understanding these Important Supreme Court cases 2024 is necessary for every aspirant to qualify for the UPSC Mains exam 2024. By analysing Landmark Supreme Court judgements and their impacts, candidates can enhance the ability to evaluate legal issues and effectively utilise these insights while drafting answers.
Enroll in our UPSC PW Online Coaching to get expert and the best resources prepare for UPSC Mains.
UPSC Mains 2024 Related Articles | |
UPSC CSE Mains 2024 | UPSC Mains Exam Pattern 2024 |
UPSC Mains Syllabus 2024 | UPSC Mains Previous Year Papers |
UPSC Mains Admit Card 2024 | UPSC Mains Previous Year Cutoff |
<div class="new-fform">
</div>
Latest Comments