Nearly a month into Operation Sindoor, attention has largely focused on tactical metrics like target hits and equipment losses.

Lessons learnt from Operation Sindoor

• Focus on Non-State Actors: India’s military responses were limited to targeting terror infrastructure, as seen in the 2016 surgical strikes and the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. These operations avoided escalation by not targeting state actors directly.
• Increased Cost: Operation Sindoor marks a strategic shift   now, state actors like the Pakistan Army will be held accountable if they support or harbour terrorists. This raises the cost of proxy warfare.
• Cold Start Doctrine: This operation shows the practical integration of India’s Cold Start Doctrine, designed for swift, limited military action without crossing the nuclear threshold. It enhances India’s deterrent posture.
• Political Messaging: “Terrorism ke liye sirf aatankwadi nahi, unke rakhwale bhi zimmedar honge.” – Narendra Modi. This statement highlights India’s stance that those sheltering terrorists will face direct consequences, reflecting zero-tolerance policy toward cross-border terrorism.
• Fading Deterrent: Historically, Pakistan used the threat of nuclear retaliation to deter India from escalating militarily. However, the success of Operation Sindoor shows this strategy is no longer effective in shaping India’s security calculus.
• Proportional Escalation: India demonstrated it can escalate proportionally — targeting state actors  without provoking a nuclear response. The absence of nuclear posturing by Pakistan validated India’s deterrence posture under the Cold Start Doctrine.
• Active Diplomatic channels: While there was no overt nuclear signaling from Pakistan, backchannel communication among the US, India, and Pakistan was active. 
  • These channels played a vital role in managing escalation risks and maintaining strategic stability.
• Precision strike warfare: The use of advanced missiles like BrahMos, SCALP, and Hammer allows for deep strikes into enemy territory without endangering pilots or aircraft. This marks a shift to low-casualty, high-impact operations.
• Maximizing Strategic Gains: This warfare style emphasizes strategic destruction through stand-off weapons while avoiding troop losses. Ground forces do not cross borders, but airpower and missile systems deliver devastating results from a distance.
• Global inspiration: India’s approach now reflects NATO operations in Libya (2011) and Russian strategies in Ukraine  both relied on air and missile dominance instead of conventional troop-heavy confrontations.
• Emergence of Smart Warfare: This marks the first significant deployment of AI-guided drones and loitering munitions in a South Asian military conflict — transforming the way limited wars are fought.
• Rapid Drone Militarisation: Both countries are progressing toward deploying suicidal drones, surveillance UAVs, and counter-drone technologies — creating a dynamic, evolving air combat landscape.
• Next-Gen Combat Strategy: Upcoming conflicts may involve drone swarms that can overwhelm radar systems and deliver precision strikes, making them battlefield game-changers.
• Global Precedent: The 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict showcased how drone warfare can completely shift battlefield outcomes, even when traditional military assets are evenly matched.
• Strategic Messaging: Both India and Pakistan framed the operation as a success through domestic media narratives, regardless of the actual military outcomes.
• Narrative Warfare Tools: Platforms like Twitter, WhatsApp, and Telegram are now critical arenas of conflict where videos (real or fake) and selective images are used for mass perception control.
• Post-Truth Warfare: In modern conflicts, facts often take a backseat. Patriotic propaganda, emotional appeals, and disinformation campaigns dominate the public’s understanding of events.
• Perception: Success today is increasingly measured by domestic morale and international image, not just on-ground tactical victories.
• Operational Coordination: Victory on the battlefield demands precise execution. In this case, it was achieved through coordinated Air Force strikes and the use of advanced drone operations, underscoring India’s evolving limited war capabilities.
• Managing International Narrative: After kinetic operations, the ability to shape global perception becomes critical. India’s success depended on post-strike communication, narrative building, and managing relationships with major international stakeholders.
• Limited Escalation: Operation Sindoor demonstrated that limited escalation is possible under the nuclear umbrella, marking a shift from past doctrine constrained by nuclear deterrence.
• Kinetic Domain: Use of missile strikes and traditional conventional arms to deliver targeted physical damage, shaping the battlefield dynamics swiftly.
• Cyber Domain: Attacks on servers, networks, and critical digital infrastructure disrupt command, control, and communication systems, crippling enemy operations remotely.
• Information Domain: Deployment of disinformation campaigns and strategic propaganda to influence public opinion, confuse adversaries, and control the conflict narrative.

Way Forward

• Future Warfare: Future conflicts will focus on critical infrastructure such as electric grids, satellites, banking servers, and railway signaling systems, marking a paradigm shift in national security threats.
• Cyber domain: The vulnerability of essential systems defines the new front line. Disruptions here can cripple civilian life and paralyze military response.
• Tri-Service Cyber Command: India urgently needs a dedicated tri-service Cyber Command with both defensive and offensive capabilities to match evolving hybrid warfare threats.
• Lessons from Ukraine Conflict: The Russia-Ukraine war showcased how cyberattacks precede physical military operations, disrupting logistics and communications before the first missile is fired.
• Reactive Diplomacy: Following the operation, peace calls from the US, France, and Russia compelled India to justify its actions retrospectively, revealing a diplomatic lag in narrative setting.
• Strategic Communication: India must engage in proactive diplomacy to secure global sympathy and strategic understanding before military operations begin.
• Utilizing Multilateral Forums: India should actively utilize forums like the G20, QUAD, and UNHRC to shape international opinion and provide pre-conflict justification.
• Strengthening Western Alliances: Bilateral trust-building with key Western powers must be leveraged to pre-empt and neutralize Pakistan’s counter-narratives in the diplomatic arena.
• Leadership and Clarity of Vision: A clear strategic direction is essential. This was reflected in the Prime Minister’s decisive approach, showcasing strong political will and national security prioritization.
• Synchronization of All Arms of Power: Strategic victory is not achieved through military means alone. It becomes truly effective only when political leadership, military precision, and diplomatic outreach function in complete synchronization.
• Strategic Risk: While proportionate escalation offers strategic flexibility, it carries high risks. A single miscalculation could trigger full-scale conventional or nuclear conflict.
• Institutionalizing Military-Diplomatic Responses: India must formulate robust Conflict Escalation Protocols that outline red-lines, rapid decision-making chains, and rules of engagement to avoid ambiguity during high-stress situations.
• Resilient Crisis Management System: Effective deterrence also depends on contingency planning and crisis response mechanisms. India must strengthen institutional capacities to manage future conflict scenarios without losing strategic control.

Conclusion

To effectively counter cross-border terrorism, India must align its military responses with a forward-looking diplomatic strategy. Proactive global engagement and narrative-building on Pakistan’s role are essential to prevent future surprises.

DOWNLOAD PDF