Consultative Regulation-Making that Should Go Further

PWOnlyIAS

June 10, 2025

Consultative Regulation-Making that Should Go Further

Recently, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a policy framework detailing its procedure for publishing regulations, directions, guidelines, and notifications.

Role of Regulators in India’s Economy

  • Economic Umpires: Regulators function as “umpires in economic fields,” ensuring fair play and adherence to rules.
    • RBI (Reserve Bank of India) acts as the “bank referee,” overseeing the banking sector. SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) regulates markets, primarily the securities market.
  • Statutory Basis: Both RBI and SEBI are created under Acts of Parliament, making them statutory bodies. They derive their rule-making power directly from Parliament.
  • Delegated Legislation: This conferral of rule-making authority by Parliament to these bodies is known as ‘Delegated Legislation’.

Quasi-Legislative Powers and the Rule of Law

  • Quasi Legislative: Quasi” means “almost,” and “Legislative” means “law-making.” This term describes bodies that, while not Parliament, act similarly by making rules.
  • Framework: Regulators exercise this power by making day-to-day rules within a broader legal framework established by Parliament.
  • Potential for Misuse: Such significant power can be misused if not subject to proper checks.
  • Upholding the Rule of Law: The principle of the ‘Rule of Law’ ensures that all exercise of power, including rule-making, follows established procedures and legal frameworks, thereby preventing arbitrary actions and promoting accountability.
  • Welcome Start: The recently published frameworks, outlining procedures for law-making by RBI and SEBI, are seen as a welcome start.

Key Features of the New Regulatory Processes

  • Impact Analyses (RBI): When proposing new regulations or amendments, the RBI will now conduct “impact analyses.”
  • Objectives (SEBI): SEBI, for its part, will state the “regulatory intent and objectives” of its proposals.
  • Public Comments: Both regulators will now invite public comments for 21 days.
  • Periodic Review: A significant reform is that they will also periodically review their own regulations.

Two Key Additions Proposed

  • Clear Economic Rationale: Regulators should clearly identify the economic rationale for their interventions.
  • Accountability Mechanisms: They should institute mechanisms to ensure accountability for periodic reviews and responses to public comments.

Understanding Market Failure

  • Core Concept: Market failure occurs “When markets can’t self-regulate efficiently.” Examples: Common instances include:
    • Information Asymmetry: Where one party in a transaction has more or better information than the other (e.g., in financial markets).
    • Monopoly: A single entity controls the market, leading to lack of competition and potentially higher prices or lower quality.
    • Pollution: Negative externalities where production or consumption imposes costs on third parties not involved in the transaction.

Solution to Market Failure

  • Targeted Intervention: Regulations are designed to fix specific, diagnosed issues arising from market failures.
    • Example: SEBI’s Insider Trading Rule: SEBI’s rule against insider trading directly addresses information asymmetry in the stock market, ensuring fair play.
  • FSLRC Emphasis (2013): The Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) emphasized that “laws must be defined in terms of their economic purpose.”

International Best Practices

  • United States: Executive memoranda mandate regulators to undertake cost-benefit analysis, ensure “least burden on society,” maximize benefits, and assess alternatives to direct regulation.
  • European Union: The Better Regulation Framework requires impact assessments to identify the problem, potential solutions and their impact, and mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation.

Challenge in Regulatory Reforms

  • Limited State Capacity: A significant hurdle to effective regulatory reform is “Limited State Capacity,” primarily stemming from a lack of expert staff.
  • Lack of Expertise: Implementing crucial regulatory practices, such as cost-benefit analyses, specifically requires professionals like economists and data scientists.
    • Most regulators currently lack such internal capacity to conduct these complex analyses effectively
  • Poor Track Record Pre-2025: The history of public consultation by regulators was poor prior to 2025.
  • Limited RBI Consultation: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) sought public comments on only 2.4% of its circulars.
  • SEBI’s Insufficient Engagement: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) engaged in public consultation for less than half of its regulations.

Way Forward

  • Clarity: Regulatory drafts should clearly define the market failure that necessitates intervention.
  • Explaining the Solution: The draft must explicitly state how the proposed rule addresses this identified market failure. This establishes a direct link between the problem and the solution.
  • Analysis: Regulators should show cost-benefit data and societal impact of the proposed regulation.
  • Establishing Framework: It is crucial to create a monitoring plan for all rules. This ensures that the effectiveness of the regulation can be assessed over time and adjustments can be made if necessary.
  • Precedent for Good Practice: The International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) already uses such a model, serving as a successful example for other regulators to emulate.
  • Annual Reporting: To enhance accountability and transparency, annual reporting on rule-making activities is suggested. This would provide a consistent overview of regulatory engagement with public feedback.
  • Resource Allocation: Substantial resources are urgently needed to strengthen existing regulatory frameworks and enable the implementation of best practices.
  • Imperative for Capacity Building: Consequently, capacity building is both urgent and essential for regulators to effectively carry out their enhanced responsibilities and ensure robust, data-driven regulation.

Conclusion

Moreover, piecemeal reforms by individual regulators may not be sufficient to ensure consistent adherence to good regulatory practice. Parliament could contemplate enactment of a law, similar to the Administrative Procedure Act in the United States, with standardised procedures for regulation-making. 

Main Practice

Q. Analyze the significance of consultative regulation-making by financial regulators in India. Examine the gaps in current frameworks adopted by RBI and SEBI, and suggest reforms drawing from international best practices. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

/*
*/

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.