Recent remarks by the U.S. President Donald Trump linking trade, tariffs, and India’s oil imports highlight a shift in global economic relations from rules-based cooperation to power-centric bilateralism.
The Shift from Liberalism to Neo-Mercantilism
The global economy is witnessing a return to Mercantilism, where economic policy serves as a tool for national security.
- Trade as Power: Modern trade is increasingly viewed as an instrument of state power rather than a mutual benefit.
- Zero-Sum Logic: Nations now equate trade surpluses with national strength and deficits with strategic weakness.
- Erosion of Restraint: Major powers have abandoned the “normative core” of global institutions, openly exercising unilateral power to protect domestic interests.
Catalysts of Global Transformation
- Rise of Populism: Economic integration caused returns to capital to grow faster than wages. This led to manufacturing declines in the West and triggered inward-looking populist movements that reject open borders.
- The China Challenge: China provided a successful alternative model by achieving immense wealth through global markets while maintaining strict state control over capital and information.
- This “excess capacity” model has stunted the industrial growth of other developing nations like India.
Challenges for the Developing World
- Weakening Multilateralism: Developing nations can no longer rely on global cooperation to negotiate on critical issues like Climate Change or Illicit Financial Flows.
- Conditional Aid: International assistance has shifted from being developmental to being strictly tied to the national interests of donor countries.
India’s Strategic Challenges
- The Demographic Paradox: India has largely failed to convert its vast youth population into a productive workforce over the last 15 years.
- Economic Stratification: The domestic economy is characterized by a narrow apex of wealth supported by a massive, powerless base of the poor.
- Low State Capacity: A lack of sustained public investment in Health and Education prevents India from building the institutional foundations needed to be a global leader.
Way Forward
- Leveraging Niche Strengths: India must double down on domains where it holds a competitive edge, such as Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Renewable Energy.
- Rebuilding the Social Contract: There is an urgent need for a commitment to sharing growth more evenly to ensure social cohesion.
- Institutional Strengthening: Moving beyond rhetoric requires building state capability and investing in human capital to avoid long-term irrelevance in a mercantilist world.
Conclusion
India’s claim to Vishwaguru must rest on internal strength, not rhetoric. Without robust state capacity and focus on the bottom of the pyramid, India risks marginalisation in a global order driven by economic and industrial power.