A Grand Vision and A Great Indian Research Deficit

A Grand Vision and A Great Indian Research Deficit 29 Dec 2025

A Grand Vision and A Great Indian Research Deficit

With its vast human capital and a rapidly expanding economy, India harbours ambitions of becoming a global power. Yet this grand vision is significantly hampered by a chronic insufficiency in research and development (R&D).

Scale of the R&D Deficit in India

  • Research Output vs Population Share: India accounts for 17.5% of the world’s population. However, it produces only about 3% of global research output. 
    • This highlights a failure to convert demographic dividend into knowledge capital.
  • Intellectual Property Creation: According to WIPO (2023): India ranked 6th globally with 64,480 patent filings, posting the fastest growth (+15.7%) among the top 20 countries; yet its global share remains low at ~1.8% of 3.55 million applications.
  • Resident Patent Intensity: India ranks 47th globally in resident patent applications per million inhabitants, indicating low per-capita innovation intensity despite high aggregate filings.
  • R&D Expenditure (Comparative): India’s gross R&D spending remains stuck at 0.6–0.7% of GDP (declining in relative terms), far below China (~2.4%), the United States (~3.5%), and Israel (>5.4%).
  • Corporate R&D Intensity: In 2023, Huawei invested CNY 164.7 billion (≈ $23.4 billion) in R&D, exceeding India’s total combined public and private R&D expenditure
    • This underscores how firm-led R&D intensity drives next-generation technological power, with NVIDIA Chairman Jensen Huang noting that Huawei is only “nanoseconds” behind the US in advanced semiconductor capability.

Structural Weaknesses in India’s Innovation Ecosystem

  • State-Dominated R&D Funding: The government accounts for ~63.6% of total R&D funding, while the private sector contributes only ~36.4%, reflecting weak industry leadership in innovation.
  • Risk-Averse Private Industry: Indian firms largely focus on incremental innovation, prefer technology licensing over in-house development, and display a limited appetite for high-risk, disruptive R&D.
  • Academia–Industry Disconnect: As highlighted in N.R. Narayana Murthy’s report, Indian academia often functions in silos, producing largely theoretical research. Technology transfer, commercialisation, and joint research mechanisms remain weak, creating a persistent “valley of death” between laboratories and markets.
  • Brain Drain of Research Talent: Despite producing large numbers of engineers and PhDs, India loses top talent to better-funded ecosystems abroad offering superior infrastructure, research freedom, and career prospects, while domestic facilities and compensation benchmarks remain uncompetitive.
  • Bureaucratic Rigidities in Public R&D: Public R&D is constrained by slow project approvals and unpredictable fund disbursement, undermining the continuity and effectiveness of long-term research programmes.

Way Forward

  • Increasing R&D Investment: India must raise R&D expenditure to at least 2% of GDP within five to seven years, through higher public spending and incentives that lift private sector participation to at least 50% of total R&D.
  • Research, Development and Innovation Fund: The ₹1 lakh crore RDI Fund is a major step, but its effectiveness will hinge on efficient disbursement and targeted support for frontier technologies.
  • Mission-Oriented Research Strategy: India should pursue national missions in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, advanced materials, and green energy, backed by long-term funding and clearly defined outcomes linked to national security and economic sovereignty.
  • Universities as Research Centres: Universities must transition from teaching-focused institutions to research-intensive hubs, requiring stronger PhD funding, competitive research faculty positions, and world-class infrastructure.
  • Strengthening Academia–Industry Linkages: Industry-sponsored research chairs and joint incubation centres should be institutionalised to bridge the academia–industry divide.
  • Strengthening the Intellectual Property Ecosystem: India must simplify patent procedures, strengthen enforcement, and offer financial incentives for commercially successful patents.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store
online store 1

Conclusion

India has the intellectual capacity and ambition to become a global innovation leader. However, the current deficit in R&D investment, highlighted by comparisons with global economies and firms such as Huawei, threatens the realisation of Viksit Bharat’s vision beyond 2047.

Mains Practice

Q. India’s demographic and human capital advantage, by itself, is inadequate to secure technological leadership in the absence of a robust innovation ecosystem. In this context, examine the structural and systemic reasons behind India’s low research and development (R&D) intensity and suggest policy and institutional reforms to strengthen the national innovation framework. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.