Imperial War: On the War Against Iran

Imperial War: On the War Against Iran 2 Mar 2026

Imperial War: On the War Against Iran

The United States–Israel–Iran conflict intensified after airstrikes killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials.

The Pretext and Failed Diplomacy

  • Contradiction of Anti-War Commitment: Despite campaigning against endless wars, the U.S. military escalation in West Asia indicates deeper strategic entanglement.
    • The USA claims to fight for the freedom of Iranians while ignoring the ongoing oppression of the Stateless Palestinians and maintaining ties with various other dictators.
  • Questionable Pre-emptive Justification: The absence of publicly available evidence of an imminent Iranian attack weakens the claim of anticipatory self-defence under international law.
  • Diplomatic Setback: Ongoing negotiations under Omani mediation between the USA and Iran were reportedly close to a breakthrough, suggesting that military action disrupted a potential diplomatic breakthrough, similar to the collapse of the 2015 nuclear agreement after the U.S. withdrawal in 2018.

Military Dynamics and Regional Escalation

  • Lack of Air Defence: Iran lacks advanced air defence systems, such as the S-400, which allowed the USA and Israel to achieve air superiority and domination to wipe out Iran’s top leadership in a first strike.
  • Iran’s Retaliation: In response, Iran has begun attacking US military bases located in neighbouring countries, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, as well as launching missiles at Israel.
  • Humanitarian Toll: The conflict has already resulted in civilian casualties, including a strike on an Iranian school that killed 150 students

Global and Economic Impact

  • Threat to the Strait of Hormuz: There is significant concern that Iran will close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical narrow passage for global oil trade, heightening the possibility of regional spillover and global oil supply disruptions.
    • If the Strait is closed, global oil prices will skyrocket.
  • Erosion of Rules-Based Order: Unilateral military action without a broad international consensus raises concerns about weakening global norms and multilateral conflict-resolution mechanisms.
  • Regional Destabilisation: The conflict risks drawing in Gulf states and major powers, expanding into a wider regional confrontation.

Strategic Implications for India

  • Energy Security: Any disruption in the Strait of Hormuz threatens India’s crude oil imports and energy stability.
  • Diaspora Concerns: Large Indian communities in Gulf countries may face security and evacuation challenges.
  • Strategic Autonomy: India must carefully balance its relationships with the U.S., Israel, and Iran while safeguarding national interests.
  • Macroeconomic Impact: Rising oil prices could aggravate inflation, fiscal pressures, and current account deficits.

About Strait of Hormuz

  • Geographical Extent: It lies between Oman and the UAE on one side and Iran on the other.
    • It links the Persian Gulf in the north to the Gulf of Oman to the south and to the Arabian Sea beyond.
  • Buffer Zone: At its narrowest, it is just 33 km wide. The designated shipping lanes within it are only about 3km in each direction, separated by a buffer zone.
  • Legal Status and Maritime Regulation: Under international maritime law framed by the United Nations, coastal states exercise sovereignty up to 12 nautical miles (about 22 km) from their shores.
    • At its narrowest point, the Strait of Hormuz lies within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman.

Imperial War

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store
online store 1

Scholarly Perspectives

  • War of Choice: Realist thinker John Mearsheimer describes this as a “War of Choice” rather than a “War of Necessity,” aimed solely at eliminating a regional adversary to protect American and Israeli interests.
  • The Power Dynamic: The situation is likened to Thucydides’ observation that “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”.

Conclusion

Immediate de-escalation and respect for international law are vital to prevent regional instability and protect the credibility of the rules-based international order and the functional relevance of multilateral institutions such as the United Nations.

Mains Practice

Q. The resurgence of unilateral military actions by major powers poses a fundamental challenge to the rules-based international order. Critically examine this statement in the context of recent US–Israel military strikes on Iran.  (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.