Synthetic Media: On Labelling of AI Generated Content

Synthetic Media: On Labelling of AI Generated Content 24 Oct 2025

Synthetic Media: On Labelling of AI Generated Content

The Union government has proposed making the labelling of AI-generated content mandatory through an amendment to the Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021.

About Synthetic Media

  • Synthetic Media – AI-Generated Content: Refers to images, videos, or audio created using Artificial Intelligence (AI), often appearing indistinguishable from real media.
  • Deepfakes – AI-Driven Fabrication: A subset of synthetic media where deep learning replaces or superimposes one person’s face, voice, or gestures onto another, producing highly realistic but fabricated content.

Concerns of Synthetic Media

  • Threat To Electoral Integrity: The proliferation of deepfakes has raised fears of electoral manipulation and disinformation, especially during politically sensitive periods like elections.
    • Although large-scale disruptions were avoided in 2024, the potential of AI-generated misinformation to undermine democratic discourse remains a serious concern.
  • Rapid Spread of Misleading Content: AI-generated lies and doctored visuals can achieve virality quickly, giving them disproportionate influence in shaping public opinion.
  • Technological Advancement of Deceptive Media: The technology to create photorealistic and convincing fake content is improving rapidly, making it increasingly difficult for users to distinguish between real and synthetic media.
  • Misuse of Public Likenesses: Public personalities have often complained, even in court, about the unauthorized use of their likenesses in AI-generated visuals and videos.
    • Such misuse can damage reputation, privacy, and public trust in digital media.
  • Rise of “AI Slop” in the Digital Space: The growing flood of low-quality, misleading, and synthetic AI content, termed “AI slop”, has degraded the reliability of online information ecosystems.
    • This trend contributes to information pollution, making it harder for users to access credible sources.

India’s Policy Response

  • Government’s Proposed Amendment: The government plans to amend the IT Rules, 2021, to make it mandatory for platforms to label AI-generated content. 
    • The move aims to ensure transparency and accountability in digital media consumption.
  • Rationale Behind the Move: India, as the second-largest AI user base, faces heightened risks of misinformation spread. 
    • Moreover, the rapidly improving realism of AI-generated visuals demands proactive regulatory steps.
  • Protection of Public Likenesses: Many public figures have complained or filed legal actions over unauthorized AI use of their likeness.
    • Labelling helps protect individual identities and prevent reputational harm.

Critique of Legislative Approach

  • Subordinate Legislation: IT Rules 2021 implement changes via executive rules rather than amending the IT Act, 2000.
  • Accountability & Separation of Powers: This bypasses parliamentary debate and public scrutiny, raising concerns about executive overreach.

Global Response

  • Voluntary Labelling by Global Platforms: Major tech firms have shown early willingness to cooperate. 
    • For example, Meta has already begun labelling AI-generated content on Facebook.
  • Industry Collaboration on Digital Provenance: The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) unites companies to verify and track digital media origins
    • Drawing from the art world’s provenance concept, digital provenance acts as a “birth certificate,” embedding metadata on creation date, ownership, software used, and AI involvement to ensure authenticity.

Way Forward

  • Ensure Democratic Oversight: AI regulation should be placed before Parliament for debate and approval to ensure transparency, legitimacy, and accountability instead of relying solely on subordinate legislation like the IT Rules.
  • Balance Innovation and Regulation: Policymakers must adopt a flexible, adaptive framework that evolves with technological advancements while maintaining safeguards for citizens’ rights and democratic values.
  • Regular Review of Legal Frameworks: The government should periodically assess and update existing digital laws to address emerging AI-related challenges.

Conclusion

Labelling AI-generated content is a welcome step against misinformation, but it needs transparent execution and periodic review for lasting impact.

Mains Practice

Q. The rise of AI-generated deepfakes poses significant legal and security challenges. Discuss how mandatory labelling of synthetic content can balance innovation with accountability in India’s digital ecosystem. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.