U.S. President Donald Trump proposed “Liberation Day Tariffs” to counter China’s economic influence and bring back industries to the U.S.

Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ Tariffs 

• Background: In recent years, many industries have shifted from the USA to China and Canada due to cost advantages and trade policies. 
• Objective: The new tariffs introduced by former US President Donald Trump are designed to revive US manufacturing by providing protection against foreign competition.
• Protectionism: This is a type of Protectionism. Protectionism is an economic policy aimed at restricting imports and promoting domestic industries through tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.
• Global Impact: These tariffs are expected to have a global effect, with significant implications for trade dynamics, including India. 
  • The tariffs might impact sectors such as automobiles, electronics, and agriculture, where India has established trade relations with the US.

Impact of Tariffs

• Countries Directly Affected: The new tariffs will primarily affect Canada, China, Brazil, Mexico, and other major trade partners. 
  • These nations rely heavily on exports to the US, and the tariffs will likely raise the costs of their goods in the American market, potentially leading to reduced trade volumes.
• Indirect Impact on Non-Trading Countries: Even countries that do not directly trade with the US will face indirect consequences. 
  • The global supply chain could experience disruptions as manufacturers in these countries seek alternative markets for their products, which could lead to shifts in global trade patterns.
• Manufacturer Strategy: US manufacturers, affected by the tariffs, may look to alternative markets outside of the US for sourcing materials or selling their goods. This could lead to reduced demand from the US, especially for products that were traditionally sourced from these tariff-affected countries
• U.S. Tariffs on China: The U.S. imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, making exports to the U.S. expensive. As a result, China is seeking alternative markets like India, Africa, and ASEAN nations to sell its surplus products.
• Risk of Chinese Goods Dumping: With restricted access to the U.S., China may dump excess steel into other markets at lower prices. This creates unfair competition, harming domestic industries in countries like India.
• Anti-Dumping Duty: To counter this, India imposed anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel imports. The aim is to protect Indian steel manufacturers from cheap imports that could undermine local production.

India’s Diplomatic Response 

• Approach: India opted for negotiation rather than confrontation in its diplomatic response to the new tariffs imposed by the US. 
  • Rather than escalating tensions, India focused on engaging in dialogue to address the issue through diplomatic channels.
• Goodwill Gesture: In a bid to ease tensions and foster better trade relations, India offered voluntary tariff reductions as a goodwill gesture towards the US. 
  • This move is aimed at demonstrating India’s commitment to fair trade and willingness to cooperate in resolving trade disputes.

Trump’s Goal Behind the Tariffs

• Reviving Domestic Industry and Jobs: The primary objective behind Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs is to revive US domestic industry and bring back manufacturing jobs that were lost due to outsourcing and competition from foreign markets. 
  • The tariffs aim to make US-made products more competitive by raising the cost of imported goods, encouraging domestic production.
• Criticism of the Approach: Trump’s approach has been critically viewed as destructive to global trade relations, as the tariffs could escalate into a trade war that may disrupt international supply chains and harm both domestic and global economies. 
  • Critics argue that such measures may hurt consumers and increase costs for everyday goods in the US, rather than benefiting the domestic workforce.
• Opportunity for Others: Despite the criticism, these tariffs present an opportunity for other countries, including India, to seize market share from US manufacturers by capitalizing on supply chain disruptions. 
  • Countries could potentially become alternative sources for US-based companies seeking cheaper manufacturing options and reliable trade partners amidst the tariff war.

India’s Manufacturing Reality

• Multiple Schemes: India has launched several initiatives to boost its manufacturing sector, including the National Manufacturing Policy (NMP), Make in India,Production Linked Incentive Scheme  and Atmanirbhar Bharat. 
  • These schemes aim to make India a global manufacturing hub by promoting self-reliance, attracting foreign investment, and creating job opportunities.
• Manufacturing Share in GDP: Despite these ambitious policies, the share of manufacturing in India’s GDP remains relatively low at 13-14%, indicating that the sector has not yet achieved the desired growth. India still faces challenges in scaling up production and increasing industrial output to the levels required for substantial economic transformation.
• Global Goods Exports: India’s goods exports account for less than 2% of global exports, highlighting its limited presence in international markets.
  • This figure reflects India’s struggle to compete with other manufacturing giants like China and the lack of sufficient global competitiveness in key manufacturing sectors.

Why India Lagged in Manufacturing

• Consumption-Led Growth: India’s economy has largely been driven by domestic consumption rather than export-led growth, which has limited its ability to compete on a global scale. 
  • The focus has been on internal demand rather than expanding India’s presence in international markets.
  • For ex:  China’s economic strategy heavily relies on exports as a key driver of growth. Goods exports contribute 18% of China’s GDP, highlighting its dependence on global markets.
• Lack of  Global Ambition: Many Indian business houses have not prioritized global expansion or the development of global manufacturing capacity, unlike their counterparts in other countries. 
  • This lack of global ambition has restricted their ability to capture a larger share of global manufacturing.
• Poor Tech Adoption: India’s manufacturing sector has been slow to adopt advanced technologies and automation. The focus has predominantly been on domestic markets, leading to inefficiencies and a failure to innovate at the pace seen in more competitive economies. 
  • The lack of technological upgradation has hindered India’s ability to compete globally.

Government-Level Issues in India’s Manufacturing Sector

• Land Acquisition and Energy Cost: The land acquisition process in India remains complex and time-consuming, with high land costs. Additionally, energy costs are significantly high, affecting the competitiveness of Indian manufacturers.
• Delayed Approvals and Tax Disputes: Bureaucratic delays in getting approvals for projects and prolonged tax disputes create an uncertain environment for businesses. These administrative bottlenecks undermine investor confidence and slow down the pace of industrial development.
• Regulatory Bias Towards Big Players: There exists a regulatory bias that often favors large corporations, making it harder for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to thrive. 
  • This unequal treatment leads to a concentration of market power, reducing competition and innovation in the manufacturing sector.
• Lack of Sectoral Focus: China’s success in the manufacturing sector is largely attributed to its focused investment in high-growth industries such as electronics, solar energy, and electric vehicles (EVs). 
  • In contrast, India has largely stagnated in critical sectors like pharma and automobiles, where it once had strong potential. Lack of innovation, investment, and infrastructure has hindered India’s competitiveness in these industries.
• Absence of a Clear Sectoral Roadmap: India’s manufacturing sector lacks a well-defined sectoral roadmap that could guide focused development and ensure consistent growth.
  

Way Forward

• Ease Land, Logistics, and Tax Systems: To boost manufacturing in India, there is a pressing need to ease land acquisition processes, streamline logistics, and simplify taxation systems.
• Union-State Collaboration: Effective collaboration between the Union and State governments is crucial for coordinated development. 
• Focus on Sector-Specific Global Leadership: India should aim for sector-specific leadership by focusing on industries where it can lead globally. 
  • Emphasis should be on sectors like electronics, renewable energy, and advanced manufacturing where India has potential to become a global player with targeted investments and strategic policies.

Conclusion

India faces a strategic opportunity as global supply chains shift, creating space for new leaders.  This is a “now or never” moment for Indian manufacturing to establish itself on the global stage.  Seizing this chance requires bold reforms, investment, and a competitive export strategy.

DOWNLOAD PDF