Answer

Introduction

The changing nature of global conflicts, particularly the extensive use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), shows that future wars will depend on speed, scale, and self-reliance. India must revamp defence manufacturing for strategic preparedness and reduced import dependence.

Body

Changing Nature of Modern Warfare and India’s Defence Requirements

• Drone Warfare: Low-cost UAVs now cause major battlefield damage, reducing dependence only on expensive conventional military platforms.
  Eg: Drones accounted for 71% of strikes on U.S. military establishments in GCC states during Tehran’s retaliation.
• Cost Efficiency: Affordable drones and missiles provide scalable strategic advantage compared to costly aircraft carriers and fighter jets.
  Eg: Ukraine and West Asia conflicts showed inexpensive UAVs effectively damaged critical military infrastructure.
• Supply Security: Dependence on foreign defence suppliers creates risks during war due to supply-chain disruptions and strategic uncertainty.
• Tech Preparedness: India must invest in autonomous systems, advanced air defence, and high-end technologies for future conflict readiness.
  Eg: India’s Defence Minister stated Operation Sindoor proved India’s technological advancement in warfare.
• Indigenous Capability: Strategic autonomy requires domestic production of critical systems like jet engines and sophisticated drones.
  

Bottlenecks in India’s Defence Procurement and Manufacturing Ecosystem

• Import Dependence: India remains among the top arms importers due to weak domestic technological capabilities and budget limitations.
  Eg: India imports from Russia, the U.S., Israel, and earlier the USSR.
• Centralised Process: Defence acquisition is over-centralised with multiple approval layers causing prolonged procurement delays.
  Eg: Procurement begins through Quantitative Requirements (QRs) followed by several official approval stages.
• Delay Burden: Projects often exceed timelines by years, affecting force readiness and modernization plans.
• Ambiguous Quantitative Requirements (QRs): Poorly framed QRs create confusion, repeated approvals, and procurement inefficiency.
• Talent Deficit: Government-owned institutions struggle to attract top scientists and engineers due to lower compensation structures.

Need for a Hybrid Defence Ecosystem for Strategic Preparedness

• Private Role: Private firms can improve speed, innovation, and competition in defence manufacturing beyond traditional DPSU dominance (over 70% of total defence manufacturing).
• Strategic Partnership (SP) Model: Strategic Partnership model links Indian private firms with foreign OEMs for advanced platform production.
• FDI Reform: Higher FDI limits improve technology transfer and joint ventures with global defence manufacturers.
  Eg: Defence FDI cap increased to 74% under the automatic route in 2020.
• Level Playing: Private players need equal treatment in procurement, payments, and representation for genuine competition.
  Eg: Preferential treatment for DPSUs and delayed payments to private firms.
• Strategic Buyer: Government should act as a strategic buyer while both public and private firms compete and collaborate fairly.

Conclusion

India does not need a choice between public and private defence production, but an effective partnership between both. A hybrid ecosystem with innovation, speed, and strategic autonomy will define India’s future security architecture.

DOWNLOAD PDF