Answer

Introduction

The Supreme Court’s recent judgment affirming the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as part of Article 21 is a significant expansion of the right to life, especially in motorised urban environments. However, in the absence of robust pedestrian infrastructure and social awareness, the legal recognition alone may not translate into safe and accessible walkable cities.

UPSC Coaching Classes

Constitutional Recognition and Rationale

• Right to life and dignity : Footpaths are essential for safe movement, particularly for children, the elderly, and differently-abled citizens.
  Eg: The case involved a five-year-old boy killed by a tanker in Karnataka, highlighting the stakes of pedestrian safety.
• Court as constitutional nudge : The judiciary seeks to influence state policy and urban planning priorities through legal recognition. It reinforces citizens’ right to public spaces against encroachments and motorised hazards.

Implementation Challenges and Cultural Limitations

• Fragmented regulatory framework : Responsibility split across municipal laws, town-planning statutes, and street design guidelines. Most cities lack continuous, unobstructed footpaths; encroachments by vendors, parking, and construction debris are common.
• Culture and enforcement gaps : Legal recognition does not automatically change public behaviour.
  Eg: Street Vendors Act, 2014 protects vendors’ rights, yet municipalities often conduct eviction drives due to weak survey and zoning implementation.
• Risk of gentrification : Overzealous enforcement could criminalise informal economic activity while prioritising aesthetics over accessibility.

Way Forward: Human-Centric Urban Planning

• Infrastructure investment : Build continuous, accessible, and well-maintained footpaths.
  Eg: Local funding allocations should prioritise pedestrian zones over ad hoc street clearance.
• Behavioral and cultural shift : Integrate road safety and pedestrian rights in civic education.
  Eg: Campaigns combining enforcement and awareness like Swachh Bharat have improved waste management adherence; similar models can shift walking culture.
• Inclusive urban governance : Ensure that footpath planning considers informal vendors and the urban poor.
  Eg: Participatory city planning in Pune’s pedestrianisation pilot projects involved citizens, vendors, and urban designers in co-creating accessible streets.

Click to Know UPSC OnlyIAS Coaching Centres

Conclusion

While the constitutional recognition of the right to walk is a landmark step, its success depends on pedestrian infrastructure, social awareness, and participatory urban planning. Legal remedies alone are insufficient; human-centric governance and cultural change are essential to make walkable cities a lived reality in India.

DOWNLOAD PDF