Unplanned Urbanisation And Policy Paradoxes Have Transformed Mixed-use Commercial Buildings In India Into Potential Fire Traps. Critically Analyse The Statement And Suggest Long-term Structural And Administrative Solutions Over Knee-jerk Reactions. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Q. Unplanned urbanisation and policy paradoxes have transformed mixed-use commercial buildings in India into potential fire traps. Critically analyse the statement and suggest long-term structural and administrative solutions over knee-jerk reactions. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

June 25, 2026

GS Paper IIIDisaster Management

Core Demand of the Question

Structural and administrative factors making mixed-use buildings fire-prone
Long-term solutions for safer urban infrastructure

Answer

Introduction

Incidents of fires in mixed-use commercial buildings, including coaching institutes, hotels, and shops, highlight vulnerabilities in urban planning and regulatory enforcement. Many buildings operate beyond their design capacity, often in congested areas, creating significant risk to human life and property. Knee-jerk reactions such as bulldozing or sealing are insufficient without addressing underlying structural and administrative challenges.

UPSC Online Preparation

Structural and Administrative Challenges

Overcrowding and mixed-use violations : Buildings sanctioned for residential purposes are often used for commercial activities, increasing fire load.
Eg: The Lucknow building gutted by fire was approved for residential use but housed commercial establishments, leading to a high casualty risk.
Poor urban infrastructure : Severe geometric constraints, violating Part 4 of the National Building Code (NBC) of India 2016 (Fire and Life Safety), which mandates a minimum compulsory approach road width of 9 to 12 metres for high-occupancy or mixed-use commercial structures.
Regulatory gaps and policy paradoxes : Relaxed compliance norms under “ease of doing business” sometimes bypass stringent fire safety checks.
Eg: Structures falling below regional height thresholds (typically <15 metres) bypass mandatory statutory Fire No-Objection Certificate (Fire NOC) protocols under State Fire Services Acts, creating unmonitored hazard pockets.
Lack of awareness among stakeholders : Owners, residents, and municipal authorities often do not understand or enforce basic fire-safety norms.
Eg: Many urban buildings lack functional fire extinguishers or evacuation signage.
Corruption and poor monitoring : Bribery and irregular approvals undermine compliance, allowing unsafe buildings to operate.

Long-Term Structural and Administrative Solutions

Integrated urban planning : Ensure proper zoning, road width, and emergency access in mixed-use developments.
Mandatory fire safety infrastructure : Install fire alarms, sprinklers, extinguishers, and refuge areas in all high-footfall buildings.
Regular audits and enforcement : Institutionalise periodic inspections and penalties for non-compliance, rather than one-time sealing or demolition.
Awareness and training programs : Educate owners, residents, and municipal staff on fire safety and emergency response.
Eg: Sensitisation programs similar to municipal campaigns for sanitation can improve compliance.
Digitisation and monitoring : Maintain a centralised database of building approvals, fire audits, and safety certifications.

Click to Know UPSC OnlyIAS Coaching Centres

Conclusion

Unplanned urbanisation and policy paradoxes have turned mixed-use buildings into fire hazards. Long-term solutions require systematic urban planning, robust enforcement, infrastructure upgrades, stakeholder awareness, and institutional monitoring rather than reactive, short-term measures.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store