Decline in Legislative Sittings: Challenges to Parliamentary Accountability

GS II: Parliament and State legislatures-structure, functioning, conduct of business, powers, privileges, and issues arising out of these.

Context: The declining number of legislative sittings, disruptions, limited debate and concerns over inadequate scrutiny of Bills have raised questions about the capacity of Parliament and State Legislatures to effectively perform their deliberative, legislative and accountability functions.

Evolution of Parliamentary Functioning

• Early Parliamentary Engagement: In the initial decades after Independence, Parliament generally met for a substantially higher number of days, providing greater opportunities for debate, questioning and legislative scrutiny.
• Declining Sitting Days: The discussion highlights a long-term decline in the average number of annual parliamentary sittings, particularly after the 1990s.
• Reduced Deliberative Space: Fewer sitting days reduce the time available for Question Hour, debates, legislative scrutiny and executive accountability.

Best Online Coaching for UPSC

Decline in State Legislative Functioning

• Reduced Sitting Days: State Legislatures have also witnessed a decline in their average number of sitting days compared with the early decades after Independence.
• Constitutional Provision: Article 174 provides that the Governor summons the State Legislature and that the gap between two sessions should not exceed six months.
• Minimum Sitting Requirement: The constitutional provision establishes the maximum interval between sessions but does not prescribe a comprehensive minimum number of annual sitting days.
• Impact on Accountability: Limited legislative time can constrain opportunities for policy debate, executive questioning and financial scrutiny.

Disruptions and Loss of Legislative Time

• Question Hour: Question Hour provides Members of Parliament an opportunity to directly question Ministers regarding government policies, decisions and implementation.
• Calling Attention: The Calling Attention mechanism enables legislators to draw ministerial attention to matters of urgent public importance.
• Impact of Disruptions: Frequent disruptions can reduce the effective time available for these mechanisms and weaken the legislature’s accountability function.
• Public Resources: Disruptions also raise concerns regarding the productive utilisation of the public resources allocated to parliamentary functioning.

Quality of Legislative Deliberation

• Complexity of Law-Making: Legislation often involves complex legal, economic and social consequences and therefore requires detailed examination and deliberation.
• Limited Debate: Bills passed with inadequate discussion may receive insufficient scrutiny regarding their provisions, implementation challenges and unintended consequences.
• Judicial Burden: Weak legislative examination can contribute to ambiguities and inconsistencies that may subsequently require greater judicial interpretation and intervention.
• Constitutional Warning: The discussion links this concern with Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s emphasis on the importance of constitutional and legislative processes.

Parliamentary Committee System

• Detailed Scrutiny: Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees provide an institutional mechanism for detailed examination of Bills, policies and government functioning.
• Cross-Party Participation: Parliamentary committees bring members from different political parties together for detailed examination of issues.
• Deliberative Advantage: Committee proceedings can provide greater scope for technical examination and evidence-based discussion than floor proceedings.
• Participation Concerns: The discussion highlights concerns relating to attendance and participation in committee proceedings.

Anti-Defection Law and Legislative Autonomy

• Purpose of the Law: The Anti-Defection Law, contained in the Tenth Schedule, was introduced to curb political defections and promote political stability.
• Party Discipline: The operation of party whips requires legislators to follow party directions on specified matters.
• Individual Deliberation: Extensive party control can limit the space available for individual legislators to independently articulate or vote on certain issues.
• Institutional Balance: The challenge lies in balancing political stability with meaningful legislative deliberation.

UPSC Online Coaching

Television and Political Incentives

• Greater Visibility: Live broadcasting of parliamentary proceedings has increased the public visibility and transparency of legislative functioning.
• Political Communication: Televised proceedings also create incentives for legislators to use parliamentary interventions as a means of communicating directly with the public.
• Disruption Concerns: The discussion highlights concerns that political attention-seeking can contribute to disruptive conduct and reduce the space for substantive debate.

Financial Cost of Parliamentary Disruptions

• Public Expenditure: Parliamentary functioning involves substantial expenditure of public funds and institutional resources.
• Productivity Concern: When disruptions prevent legislative business from being conducted, the effective utilisation of these resources becomes a concern.
• Accountability Principle: Parliamentary time represents a public resource and therefore requires productive and accountable utilisation.

Strengthening Legislative Accountability

• No-Work-No-Pay: Linking certain remuneration or allowances with attendance and participation has been suggested as a mechanism to encourage legislative engagement.
• Minimum Sitting Days: A clearly defined annual legislative calendar can ensure adequate time for debate, scrutiny and accountability.
• Presiding Officers: Presiding officers can enforce parliamentary rules more consistently while ensuring adequate opportunities for both government and opposition to participate.
• Constructive Opposition: Opposition parties can strengthen accountability through substantive debate, committee scrutiny and structured parliamentary interventions rather than persistent disruption.

Rationalising the Whip System

• Limited Application: The use of the whip can be reconsidered so that it is primarily applied to matters where government stability and party discipline are directly involved.
• Ordinary Legislation: Greater deliberative freedom on routine legislative matters can allow legislators to engage more independently with the substance of Bills.
• Legislative Autonomy: Such an approach can seek to balance party cohesion with individual legislative responsibility.

Way Forward

• Predictable Legislative Calendar: Parliament and State Legislatures should have adequate and predictable sitting schedules to ensure sufficient time for legislative business.
• Committee-Based Scrutiny: Greater use of Standing Committees can improve the examination and quality of legislation.
• Legislative Research: Members should have stronger research and institutional support for evidence-based parliamentary deliberation.
• Responsible Political Conduct: Both government and opposition should ensure that political contestation does not undermine the core legislative and accountability functions of the House.
• Balanced Party Discipline: Parliamentary reforms should preserve political stability while creating adequate space for meaningful individual and committee-level deliberation.

Click to Explore UPSC Offline Coaching

Conclusion

A vibrant legislature requires more than periodic sessions; it requires adequate sitting time, substantive debate, effective committee scrutiny and executive accountability. Strengthening these dimensions can restore the deliberative character of Parliament and State Legislatures while improving the quality of democratic governance.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store