GS II: Structure, organization, and functioning of the Judiciary.
Context: The Supreme Court has issued an interim order prohibiting the unauthorised extraction, editing, dissemination, reposting, uploading and monetisation of audio and video recordings of live-streamed court proceedings on social media without prior permission from the concerned court authorities.
Background
- Live Streaming of Court Proceedings: The Supreme Court began live-streaming Constitution Bench proceedings in September 2022, following the landmark Swapnil Tripathi v. Union of India (2018) judgment.
- AI-Assisted Transcription: In February 2023, the Supreme Court introduced AI-assisted live transcription to create authentic digital records of court proceedings.
UPSC Course Fees Online
Need for the Interim Order
- Selective Editing: Short and out-of-context video clips are often circulated, misrepresenting judicial observations and proceedings.
- Commercial Exploitation: Courtroom proceedings are increasingly being monetised on social media platforms for commercial gain.
- Misinformation: Edited recordings may distort judicial proceedings, creating misleading public narratives.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Risks: AI-based tools can manipulate audio and video recordings, enabling the creation of deceptive or fabricated content.
- Protection of Judicial Independence: Selective circulation of courtroom exchanges may expose judges and lawyers to trolling, harassment, and undue public pressure, thereby affecting the administration of justice.
Associated Constitutional and Legal Framework
- Article 21: The right to access justice has been interpreted to include reasonable public access to court proceedings.
- Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees freedom of speech and expression, including freedom of the press, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2).
- Article 129: Declares the Supreme Court as a Court of Record, empowering it to preserve records and punish for contempt.
- Article 215: Declares every High Court to be a Court of Record with similar powers.
Key Directions Issued by the Supreme Court
- Prior Permission Mandatory: Audio or video recordings of judicial proceedings cannot be extracted, edited, uploaded, reposted, disseminated or monetised without permission from the Secretary General of the Supreme Court or the Registrar General of the concerned High Court.
- News Reporting Exempted: The order expressly states that it does not restrict bona fide reporting of court proceedings by the media.
- Implementation by Courts: The Supreme Court directed itself and all High Courts to upload the interim order on their official websites.
- Reports from High Courts: All High Courts have been directed to submit reports regarding implementation of the Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings, 2022.
- Consultation with Union Government: The Union Government has been asked to identify the nodal Ministries and relevant digital intermediaries for framing an effective regulatory framework.
Supreme Court’s Observations
- Open Justice with Safeguards: Transparency must not come at the cost of the integrity of judicial proceedings.
- Digital Records Need Protection: Easy availability of court recordings has become a potential threat to the administration of justice when misused.
- Court Archive: The Court suggested maintaining an official digital archive of proceedings with controlled access for authorised persons.
- Virtual Hearing Links: The indiscriminate sharing of virtual hearing links also facilitates misuse and requires greater regulation.
Legal Framework
- Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India (2018): The Supreme Court held that live streaming of court proceedings is an extension of the constitutional principle of open justice and advances the right to access justice under Article 21.
- Live Streaming of Constitution Bench Proceedings (2022): The Supreme Court commenced live streaming of Constitution Bench proceedings in September 2022.
- Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings (2022): Framed by the Supreme Court e-Committee, these rules prohibit the unauthorised recording, reproduction, sharing, or dissemination of livestreamed proceedings.
- AI-assisted Live Transcription (2023): The Supreme Court became the first Indian court to introduce AI-assisted live transcription, creating an accurate digital archive of court proceedings.
UPSC Coaching Classes
Significance of the Judgment
- Promotes Transparency: Strengthens openness and accountability in the judicial process.
- Enhances Access to Justice: Enables citizens, lawyers, researchers, and students to observe court proceedings remotely.
- Improves Public Awareness: Increases legal literacy and public understanding of constitutional and legal issues.
- Creates Official Records: Digital recordings and AI-assisted transcripts help preserve authentic judicial records.
- Strengthens Judicial Accountability: Public visibility enhances confidence in the justice delivery system.
Challenges
- Selective Presentation: Partial clips may misrepresent judicial reasoning and influence public perception.
- Social Media Trials: Viral circulation of edited content may lead to public opinion being formed before judicial decisions are delivered.
- Threat to Judicial Independence: Judges and lawyers may face trolling, intimidation, or reputational harm due to distorted online content.
- Privacy Concerns: Sensitive proceedings involving victims, children, or confidential matters require greater protection.
- AI-enabled Manipulation: Deepfakes and synthetic media can alter courtroom recordings, undermining the authenticity of judicial proceedings.
Way Forward
- Strengthen Regulatory Framework: Develop comprehensive guidelines governing the use, storage, and dissemination of judicial recordings.
- Official Digital Repository: Maintain authenticated archives of court proceedings with controlled public access.
- Platform Accountability: Require digital intermediaries to promptly remove manipulated or unauthorised judicial content upon notification.
- Use of Watermarking and Authentication: Introduce digital watermarking and content verification mechanisms to prevent tampering.
- Balanced Approach: Ensure that judicial transparency is preserved while protecting the dignity, independence, and integrity of the judiciary.
Click to Know UPSC OnlyIAS Coaching Centres
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s interim order balances Open Justice with the integrity and fairness of judicial proceedings. As courts become increasingly digital, robust safeguards against misuse and misinformation will be crucial to maintaining public trust in the judiciary.
27 Jul 2026
