The Supreme Court of India expanded the definition of acid attack victims to include survivors of forcible acid ingestion under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
SC Observations on Acid Attack Victims
- Expanded Definition of Victims: The Court held that “acid attack victims” must include not only those subjected to acid throwing but also those forcibly administered acid, ensuring broader legal recognition.
- Recognition of Invisible Injuries: The Court clarified that victims suffering internal injuries without visible disfigurement are equally entitled to protection and benefits under the law.
- Retrospective Applicability: The expanded definition will operate retrospectively from 2016, ensuring past victims of acid ingestion can claim disability benefits.
UPSC Online Preparation
Provisions for Acid Attack Victims under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act
- Inclusion as Benchmark Disability: Acid attack victims are recognised under the category of specified disabilities, enabling access to welfare schemes and legal safeguards.
- Entitlement to Social Security Benefits: Victims are eligible for financial assistance, rehabilitation support, and disability pensions provided by the government.
- Identity Certification: The Act mandates issuance of disability certificates/ID cards, facilitating access to healthcare, education, and employment benefits.
- Reservation and Non-Discrimination: Victims benefit from reservations in education and public employment, along with protection against discrimination.
About Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016
- The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 is a comprehensive law aimed at protecting the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities.
- Origin and Background: The Act was enacted to implement the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by India in 2007.
- It replaced the outdated Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, aligning domestic law with global standards.
- Key Provisions
- Expanded Definition of Disabilities: The Act increases recognised disabilities from 7 to 21 categories and empowers the government to notify additional conditions.
- Rights-Based Approach: It shifts from a welfare-based to a rights-based framework, ensuring equality, dignity, and full participation in society.
- Reservation in Jobs and Education: Provides 4% reservation in government jobs and 5% in higher education institutions for persons with benchmark disabilities.
- Institutional Mechanisms: Establishes Central and State Advisory Boards and appoints Chief Commissioners to monitor implementation.
- Accessibility and Inclusion: Mandates accessibility in public buildings, transport, and information systems under the “Accessible India Campaign”.
|
Significance
- Strengthening Disability Justice: The judgment ensures inclusivity by recognising previously excluded victims, bridging legal gaps in disability rights.
- Gender Justice Dimension: As most victims are women, the ruling advances gender justice and aligns with constitutional principles of equality.
- Judicial Activism under Article 142: The Court used its extraordinary powers to deliver “complete justice,” ensuring immediate relief without waiting for legislative amendment.
- Policy Implications: Encourages the government to adopt a comprehensive framework for prevention, rehabilitation, and long-term care of acid attack survivors.
Click to Explore UPSC Offline Coaching
Conclusion
The ruling strengthens disability rights by ensuring inclusive recognition, immediate relief, and equal access to justice and welfare for all acid attack survivors, including ingestion victims.