Answer

Introduction

With the rise of digital work tools, the distinction between office hours and personal time has steadily faded. As platforms like Zoom, Slack, and WhatsApp make employees reachable at all times, the home has effectively become a permanent workplace, creating a culture of continuous connectivity that traps workers in a “digital leash” and fuels chronic burnout.

Body

Significance of the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025

• Statutory Autonomy: Bill grants employees the legal right to ignore work-related communication after hours without fear of disciplinary action.
  Eg: The Bill aims to address the power asymmetry where employees feel compelled to respond to late-night pings to prove “commitment.”
• Institutional Oversight: It proposes the creation of an Employees’ Welfare Authority to monitor digital overreach and ensure company-level compliance.
• Monetizing Digital Labour: The Bill seeks to treat after-hours digital engagement as “work,” mandating overtime compensation for voluntary responses.
  Eg: This aligns with international precedents in France and Australia, shifting the focus from “presenteeism” to “productivity”.
• Mental Health Safeguard: By recognizing “uninterrupted rest” as a right, it targets the root causes of anxiety and sleep disorders prevalent in the IT and service sectors.
  Eg: ILO data reveals over 51% of Indian professionals work more than 49 hours a week, making such protections a public health necessity.

Challenges in Implementation

• Global Service Commitments: India’s service-led economy relies heavily on Western time zones, making a rigid “disconnection” period operationally difficult for IT and KPO sectors.
  Eg: Industry leaders argue that a one-size-fits-all law could undermine India’s global competitiveness in 24/7 client support.
• Informal Sector Exclusion: The Bill primarily targets white-collar digital work, leaving nearly 90% of the informal workforce, including gig workers and MSME employees, without protection.
• Enforcement Ambiguity: Monitoring informal communication channels like WhatsApp poses significant evidentiary challenges for regulators and grievance committees.
  Eg: Distinguishing between a “critical emergency” and routine manager overreach remains a subjective grey area.
• Productivity Paradox: Concerns exist that in a developing economy aiming for “Viksit Bharat @ 2047,” such regulations might be perceived as a constraint on national growth.

Conclusion

The Right to Disconnect is a necessary evolution of labour rights for the 21st century. The way forward lies in a sector-specific, phased approach integrating these rights into the new Labour Codes while allowing flexibility for global delivery models. Cultivating a “culture of respect” for personal time, supported by “digital detox” guidelines, will ensure that India’s digital growth does not come at the cost of its human capital’s well-being.

DOWNLOAD PDF