The Punjab Assembly unanimously passed the ‘Jaagat Jot Sri Guru Granth Sahib Satkar (Amendment) Bill, 2026’, aimed at harsher punishment for sacrilege of the Guru Granth Sahib, including life imprisonment.
- It proposes to amend the 2008 law enacted under the Shiromani Akali Dal–Bharatiya Janata Party government.
UPSC Online Courses
About Guru Granth Sahib
- The Guru Granth Sahib is the holy scripture of Sikhism
- It is regarded as the central religious text and spiritual guide of the Sikh community
- Compilation
- Compiled by Guru Arjan Dev
- Later finalized and given its present form by Guru Gobind Singh
Status in Sikhism
- Considered the eternal Guru after Guru Gobind Singh
- Holds the highest spiritual authority in Sikhism
|
About Sacrilege
- The Bill defines sacrilege as any wilful and deliberate act intended to desecrate the Guru Granth Sahib.
- This includes physical damage, defacing, burning, tearing, or theft of the saroops of Guru Granth Sahib or part, or through words, either spoken or written, signs, visible representations, or electronic means that are intended to hurt the religious sentiments of those persons professing the Sikh faith.
Key Features
- Punishment: Anyone committing sacrilege of the Guru Granth Sahib can face imprisonment of not less than seven years, which may extend to 20 years, along with a fine between ₹2 lakh and ₹10 lakh
- In cases involving criminal conspiracy with the intent to disrupt peace or communal harmony, the punishment ranges from a minimum of ten years to life imprisonment, with fines between ₹5 lakh and ₹25 lakh.
- Nature of offence: All offences under the law will be cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
- Those aiding sacrilege will be treated as equally culpable.
- Investigation: The offence shall be investigated by a police officer, not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or Assistant Commissioner of Police, as the case may be.
Rationale for Bringing Bill
- The State government argues that recent incidents have attempted to disturb peace and communal harmony in Punjab.
- It says the amendment seeks to deter such acts by ensuring stringent punishment, including life imprisonment, for those found guilty.
UPSC Online Preparation
Concerns
- Against Secular Ethos: In 2016, the SAD-BJP government passed two amendment bills — The Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016, and The Code of Criminal Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 — prescribing life imprisonment for desecration of the Guru Granth Sahib, but the Centre returned them, asserting that all religions must be treated equally under India’s secular framework
- Legally Vulnerable: Critics argue that the amendment departs from the original purpose of the 2008 Act, which was aimed at regulating the printing, publication, and distribution of the Guru Granth Sahib to preserve its sanctity.
- Expanding it to include stringent criminal penalties such as life imprisonment may make the law legally vulnerable.
- Conflict with Central Law: Although States can legislate on criminal law, they cannot prescribe punishments exceeding limits set by central laws like the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (earlier Indian Penal Code). Since offences like sacrilege under Section 295A IPC/299 BNS carry a maximum of three years’ imprisonment, any State law prescribing life imprisonment creates a direct conflict, where Central law prevails, making such amendments legally untenable.
- Law & Order Issues: Incidents of sacrilege often lead to protests and can escalate into violence, thereby disturbing public order.
- Political Implications: Such incidents are frequently used in electoral narratives, particularly in Punjab, leading to political polarization.
- Communal Harmony: Acts of sacrilege can strain inter-community relations and pose a threat to social harmony.
Way Forward
- Speedy Investigation & Judicial Process: Ensuring time-bound investigation and fast-track trials can enhance accountability and prevent escalation of tensions.
- Depoliticization of Religious Issues: Religious matters should be kept free from political interference to avoid polarization and maintain public trust.
- Community Engagement & Interfaith Dialogue: Promoting dialogue among different communities can foster mutual respect and reduce the risk of conflict.
- Strict but Balanced Legal Framework: Laws should be strict enough to deter sacrilege, while also ensuring they do not infringe upon fundamental rights like Article 19.
- Awareness Against Misinformation: Spreading awareness and ensuring responsible use of social media can help curb rumors and prevent unnecessary unrest.
Click to Know UPSC OnlyIAS Coaching Centres
Sacrilege and India’s Constitution
- Freedom of Religion: Article 25 guarantees individuals the freedom to profess, practice, and propagate religion
- Acts of sacrilege violate this spirit by hurting religious beliefs and practices
- Freedom of Expression vs Reasonable Restrictions: Article 19 ensures freedom of speech and expression
- However, it is subject to reasonable restrictions on grounds such as public order, morality, and decency
- Sacrilegious acts may be restricted if they incite violence or disturb public order
- Right to Equality: Article 14 ensures equal protection of laws
- Laws against sacrilege must be applied uniformly across all religions
|