Subject: GS 4: Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude
Context: The NEET paper leak controversy has reignited concerns over corruption and accountability in India. Despite reforms such as Digitalisation, the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, and institutions like the Lokpal, debates continue on whether corruption has actually declined or merely changed its form.
- In the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, India ranks 91st with a score of 39.
UPSC Course Fees Online
What is Corruption?
- Corruption is the abuse of public office or authority for private gain.
- It ranges from petty bribery in service delivery to grand corruption involving public contracts, policy decisions, and political financing.
Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for Fighting Corruption in India
Legal Framework
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amended in 2018): The principal anti-corruption law that penalises corruption by public servants. The 2018 amendment criminalised both bribe-taking by public officials and bribe-giving by individuals or entities.
- Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002: Seeks to prevent money laundering by confiscating and restricting the use of proceeds of crime, including assets generated through corrupt practices.
- Companies Act, 2013: Promotes corporate governance, transparency, and accountability. It provides a broad definition of fraud and prescribes criminal penalties for fraudulent and corrupt corporate practices.
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (now replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023): Previously contained provisions relating to criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery, and fraud, which were frequently invoked in corruption cases. Similar offences are now covered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988: Prohibits holding property in the name of another person to conceal the real ownership, thereby preventing the use of benami assets to hide illicit wealth.
Regulatory and Institutional Framework
- Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013: Establishes the Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayuktas in States as independent anti-corruption ombudsmen to investigate allegations against public functionaries.
- Central Vigilance Commission (CVC): An apex vigilance institution that supervises vigilance administration in Central Government organisations and advises the government on matters relating to corruption prevention.
- Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952: Strengthened anti-corruption enforcement by enhancing penalties for corruption-related offences under the IPC and facilitating the establishment of Special Courts for speedy trials.
- 1964 Anti-Corruption Amendments: Expanded the definition of public servant and criminal misconduct, and made possession of assets disproportionate to known sources of income a punishable offence, thereby strengthening the legal framework against illicit enrichment.
Reasons Behind Corruption in India
- Lack of Transparency: Limited transparency in government decision-making, administration, and public processes creates opportunities for corruption. When official actions are not open to public scrutiny, corrupt practices become easier to conceal.
- Weak Institutions and Ineffective Legal Framework: Institutions responsible for enforcing laws, such as the police, judiciary, and oversight agencies, often suffer from capacity constraints or undue influence. Weak enforcement and delayed justice reduce accountability and enable corrupt practices.
- Perception of Impunity: Inadequate investigation, delayed trials, and lenient punishment create a belief that corruption carries little risk. This perception encourages individuals to engage in corrupt activities without fear of serious consequences.
- Low Salaries and Poor Incentives: Inadequate remuneration, particularly for lower-level public officials, can increase the temptation to accept bribes or misuse public office as a means of supplementing income.
- Bureaucratic Red Tape: Complex procedures, excessive regulations, and administrative delays often encourage citizens and businesses to resort to bribery to speed up approvals or avoid procedural hurdles.
- Licence-Permit-Based Regulatory System: A complicated system of licences, permits, and regulatory approvals increases discretionary powers of officials, creating opportunities for rent-seeking and corrupt transactions.
- Political Interference: Frequent political influence over administrative decisions undermines institutional independence. Officials may be pressured to favour particular individuals or groups for political or personal interests.
- Socio-Cultural Acceptance: In some sections of society, corruption is viewed as a routine or unavoidable practice. Such social acceptance weakens ethical standards and normalises corrupt behaviour.
Challenges in Tackling Corruption
- Weakening of the RTI Framework: The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 amended RTI provisions on personal information, leading to wider interpretation of privacy and greater denial of information, thereby reducing transparency in corruption investigations.
- Judicial Interpretations Favouring Privacy: Judgments such as Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC (2012) and Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) have strengthened privacy rights, which critics argue can sometimes limit transparency and public accountability.
- Weak Anti-Corruption Institutions: Institutions such as the Lokpal, Lokayuktas, CBI, ED, and vigilance bodies often face issues of slow investigations, uneven performance, allegations of selective action, and limited operational independence.
- Legal and Procedural Constraints: Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act (2018 Amendment) requires prior government approval before investigating certain decisions of public servants, which may delay inquiries and weaken independent investigations.
- Judicial Delays and Low Conviction Rates: Corruption cases often remain pending for years due to lengthy investigations and trials, reducing the certainty of punishment and making corruption a high-profit, low-risk activity.
Why Corruption Remains a Major Threat?
- Economic Impact
- Reduces investment by creating an uncertain and unfair business environment.
- Increases project costs through bribery, delays, and cost overruns.
- Encourages crony capitalism by favouring politically connected businesses.
- Distorts market competition by undermining merit and efficiency.
- Social Impact
- Weakens education delivery through misuse of public funds and poor accountability.
- Leads to leakages in healthcare services and procurement.
- Diverts welfare benefits away from deserving beneficiaries.
- Increases inequality by disproportionately affecting vulnerable sections.
- Political Impact
- Weakens democracy by compromising free and fair governance.
- Reduces public trust in government institutions.
- Encourages misuse of public institutions for political or personal gain.
- Affects electoral integrity through illegal funding and vote-buying.
- Governance Impact
- Weakens the rule of law by promoting impunity.
- Delays justice due to corruption in investigation and judicial processes.
- Reduces administrative efficiency by encouraging red tape and rent-seeking.
UPSC Online Coaching
| Aspect |
How Digitalisation Reduces Corruption |
Limitations |
| Service Delivery |
Reduces human interface, limiting bribery and discretionary decision-making. |
Digital divide excludes citizens with poor internet access or low digital literacy. |
| Transparency |
Creates digital records, online tracking, and real-time monitoring of government services. |
Algorithmic opacity and lack of oversight may reduce accountability. |
| Welfare Delivery |
Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) reduces leakages and eliminates ghost beneficiaries. |
Errors in authentication or exclusion can deny benefits to genuine beneficiaries. |
| Public Procurement |
E-procurement and e-tendering improve competition and reduce manipulation. |
Collusion or manipulation can still occur if oversight is weak. |
| Financial Transactions |
JAM Trinity (Jan Dhan–Aadhaar–Mobile) promotes transparent and direct fund transfers. |
Cyber fraud, identity theft, and digital scams have emerged as new challenges. |
| Accountability |
Digital audit trails and online grievance portals improve monitoring and traceability. |
Dependence on intermediaries continues in many areas, enabling corruption. |
| Overall Assessment |
Digitalisation has significantly reduced petty and procedural corruption and improved efficiency. |
It cannot eliminate systemic corruption without strong institutions, judicial reforms, and effective enforcement. |
Way Forward
- Strengthen the Right to Information (RTI)
- Protect citizens’ right to access information to promote transparency.
- Maintain a balance between transparency and privacy concerns.
- Strengthen Anti-Corruption Institutions
- Ensure the independent functioning of key accountability institutions:
- Lokpal
- Lokayuktas
- Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)
- Information Commissions
- Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and other vigilance bodies
- Ensure Speedy Disposal of Corruption Cases
- Establish special courts for corruption-related offences.
- Fix time limits for investigation and trial.
- Improve conviction rates through effective prosecution.
- Ensure Transparent Appointments
- Adopt merit-based selection for accountability institutions.
- Make appointments transparent and free from political interference.
- Safeguard institutional independence to enhance credibility.
- Strengthen Grievance Redressal
- Enact a comprehensive grievance redressal law.
- Ensure time-bound disposal of public complaints.
- Improve Digital Governance
- Bridge the digital divide to ensure inclusive access to services.
- Increase digital literacy among citizens.
- Expand assisted service centres for easier access to government services.
- Reduce dependence on intermediaries through end-to-end digital processes.
- Promote Citizen Participation
- Protect RTI activists and whistleblowers from harassment and threats.
- Encourage social audits to improve accountability in public programmes.
- Promote proactive disclosure of information by government departments to enhance transparency.
Click to Know UPSC Offline Courses
Conclusion
Digital governance and transparency laws have reduced opportunities for some forms of corruption, but technology alone cannot eliminate corruption. Effective institutions, independent investigations, speedy justice, robust grievance redressal, and empowered citizens remain essential to uphold the rule of law and achieve the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047.
25 Jul 2026
