Subject: GS 2: Polity and Governance
Context: The Union Government has opposed petitions before the Supreme Court seeking the introduction of an income-based creamy layer within Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).
- The Centre has reiterated that the creamy layer principle does not apply to SCs and STs, while arguing that any such policy change requires a comprehensive empirical study and legislative review.
Best Online Coaching for UPSC
About Creamy Layer
- The Creamy Layer refers to the socially, educationally, and economically advanced sections that are excluded from reservation benefits to ensure that affirmative action reaches the genuinely disadvantaged.
- Objective: It seeks to prevent the concentration of reservation benefits among relatively advanced families and promote equitable distribution within reserved categories.
- Applicability and Criteria:
-
- Current Applicability: The creamy layer principle presently applies only to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and does not apply to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) for reservation in education and public employment.
- Basis of Exclusion: Unlike SCs/STs, whose reservation is primarily based on historical social discrimination and untouchability, the OBC creamy layer is determined through income and social advancement criteria.
- Current Income Limit: The OBC creamy layer income ceiling is presently ₹8 lakh per annum (excluding salary and agricultural income under specified conditions).
About Scheduled Castes (SCs) & Scheduled Tribes (STs)
- Scheduled Castes (SCs): Communities historically subjected to untouchability and social discrimination, specified under Article 341 of the Constitution.
- Scheduled Tribes (STs): Communities identified by their distinct tribal characteristics, geographical isolation, and socio-economic backwardness, specified under Article 342 of the Constitution.
Associated Constitutional Framework:
- Article 15(4): Enables the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, SCs and STs.
- Article 15(5): Provides reservation in educational institutions, including private institutions (except minority institutions).
- Article 16(4): Permits reservation in public employment for inadequately represented backward classes.
- Article 16(4A): Provides reservation in promotion for SCs and STs.
Supreme Court Judgments:
- Indra Sawhney Case (1992): Introduced the Creamy Layer doctrine for OBC reservations and held that it does not apply to SCs and STs.
- M. Nagaraj Case (2006): While dealing with reservation in promotions, the Court made observations regarding backwardness and efficiency, but did not extend the creamy layer principle to SCs/STs.
- Jarnail Singh Case (2018): Applied the creamy layer principle to SC/ST reservations in promotions to exclude the advanced sections, while retaining constitutional protection for reservation.
- State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024): A Seven-Judge Bench upheld the constitutional validity of sub-classification within SCs and STs to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits.
- In a separate opinion, Justice B.R. Gavai observed that governments should consider identifying a creamy layer within SCs and STs, though with criteria different from OBCs.
- Supreme Court Proceedings (2026): The Court is presently hearing petitions seeking income-based creamy layer exclusion for SCs/STs and has sought the Centre’s response as well as an Action Taken Report following the Davinder Singh judgment.
SC/ST Sub-Categorisation:
- Meaning: Dividing the existing SC/ST reservation quota into sub-groups to ensure that relatively more backward communities are not crowded out by better-represented groups.
- Legal Basis: The Supreme Court’s 2024 State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh judgment upheld the power of State governments to undertake such sub-categorisation within the existing SC/ST lists.
- Constitutional Position: Parliament retains the power to include or exclude communities from the SC/ST lists, while States can sub-classify communities within the existing lists.
- State-wise Status: Telangana, Haryana and Punjab have pursued SC sub-categorisation, while Mizoram has undertaken sub-categorisation within the ST quota.
- Central Example: At the national level, sub-categorisation has been used for ST reservations in Eklavya Model Residential Schools, with provisions to ensure representation of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs).
|
Centre’s Stand
- Reservation Based on Social Discrimination: It argues that reservation for SCs and STs is intended to address historical discrimination, untouchability, and social exclusion, and cannot be equated with OBC reservations based primarily on social and educational backwardness.
- Need for Empirical Evidence: Any proposal to introduce an income-based creamy layer should be preceded by a comprehensive socio-economic study assessing its implications.
- Existing Means Test: The Government has stated that most welfare and development schemes for SCs, STs, and OBCs (other than reservation in education and public employment) already incorporate income or means-based eligibility criteria to ensure targeted delivery.
- No Violation of Fundamental Rights: According to the Centre, the petitions neither raise a substantial constitutional issue nor demonstrate any violation of fundamental rights.
- Parliament’s Exclusive Domain: The Government has reiterated that only Parliament has the constitutional authority to include or exclude communities from the SC/ST lists under Articles 341 and 342.
Arguments in Favour of Introducing Creamy Layer in SC/ST Reservations
- Equitable Distribution of Benefits: Excluding the relatively advanced sections within SCs and STs would enable reservation benefits to reach the most deprived and underrepresented communities.
- Prevents Concentration of Benefits: A creamy layer mechanism can reduce the repeated capture of reservation benefits by a limited number of economically and educationally advanced families across generations.
- Promotes Intra-Category Equity: It can address disparities among different sub-groups within SCs and STs, complementing the principle of sub-classification recognised by the Supreme Court in the Davinder Singh (2024) judgment.
- Strengthens Social Justice: Reservation benefits would be better aligned with the constitutional objective of uplifting those who continue to suffer multiple forms of deprivation.
- Improves Targeting of Affirmative Action: Income and socio-economic filters may enhance the efficiency of reservation policies by directing benefits towards the most vulnerable sections.
Arguments Against Introducing Creamy Layer in SC/ST Reservations
- Historical Basis of Reservation: Reservations for SCs and STs are primarily intended to remedy historical discrimination, untouchability, and social exclusion, which cannot be measured solely through income or economic status.
- Continuing Social Discrimination: Even economically advanced members of SCs and STs may continue to experience caste-based discrimination, exclusion, and prejudice in education, employment, and society.
- Judicial Position: The Indra Sawhney (1992) judgment held that the creamy layer principle applies only to OBCs, recognising the distinct constitutional basis of SC/ST reservations.
- Existing Welfare Targeting: Most welfare schemes for SCs, STs, and OBCs already apply means-based eligibility criteria, ensuring that developmental benefits reach economically weaker sections.
- Lack of Empirical Evidence: The Centre has argued that there is presently no comprehensive socio-economic study establishing the need for an income-based creamy layer within SCs and STs.
UPSC Course Fees Online
India’s Earlier Initiatives:
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: Protects SCs and STs against caste-based atrocities and discrimination while ensuring access to justice.
- PM-AJAY (Pradhan Mantri Anusuchit Jaati Abhyuday Yojana) (2021): Promotes socio-economic development of Scheduled Castes through infrastructure, skill development, and income-generation activities.
- Development Action Plan for Scheduled Tribes (DAPST): Earmarks dedicated budgetary resources for the socio-economic development of Scheduled Tribes.
- National Commission for Scheduled Castes (Article 338): Monitors safeguards and investigates issues relating to the welfare and constitutional rights of Scheduled Castes.
- National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (Article 338A): Safeguards the rights and interests of Scheduled Tribes and advises the Government on policy matters.
|
Click to Know UPSC Coaching Centres in India
Conclusion
The creamy layer debate in SC/ST reservations seeks to balance social justice, substantive equality, and equitable distribution of reservation benefits. Any reform must uphold the constitutional objective of remedying historical discrimination, guided by empirical evidence, judicial principles, and democratic consensus.
8 Aug 2026
