The Union Cabinet has approved increasing the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India.
UPSC Online Classes
Changing Strength of Supreme Court Judges
- Constitutional Provision: Article 124 of the Indian Constitution establishes and defines the Supreme Court of India.
- It stipulates the appointment of a Chief Justice and other judges by the President, sets their retirement age at 65, and outlines procedures for removal due to misbehavior or incapacity.
- Article 124(1) provides that the Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of India and such number of judges as Parliament may prescribe by law.
- Parliament’s Power to Increase Strength: Parliament exercises the authority to increase the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges through amendments to the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956.
- Role of the Supreme Court Collegium: After Parliament increases the sanctioned strength, the Supreme Court Collegium recommends eligible judges to the Union Government for appointment to the Court.
Evolution in Number of Judges Since Independence
- Original Strength in 1950: The Constitution originally envisaged a Supreme Court consisting of the Chief Justice of India and seven puisne judges.
- Expansion Through Legislative Amendments
-
- 1956 Amendment: The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 increased the strength from 8 to 11 judges.
- 1960 Amendment: The sanctioned strength was further increased from 11 to 14 judges due to rising judicial workload.
- 1977 Amendment: Parliament raised the number of judges from 14 to 18 to address growing pendency of cases.
- 1986 Amendment: The strength of the Supreme Court increased from 18 to 26 judges to improve judicial efficiency.
- 2008 Amendment: The number of judges was enhanced from 26 to 31 in response to expanding litigation and constitutional matters.
- 2019 Amendment: The sanctioned strength increased from 31 to 34 judges, including the Chief Justice of India.
- 2026 Proposed Amendment: The proposed amendment seeks to increase the total strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India.
Rationale Behind Increasing Number of Judges
- Reducing Case Pendency: The Supreme Court faces a massive backlog of over 92,000 pending cases, requiring additional judges to ensure faster disposal and timely justice delivery.
- The rise in e-filing and post-pandemic litigation has significantly increased the inflow of cases before the Court.
- Improving Judicial Efficiency: A larger bench strength enables the Court to constitute more constitutional benches and regular benches simultaneously for efficient functioning.
- Additional judges can help reduce delays in constitutional interpretation, civil disputes, criminal appeals, and public interest litigations.
- Addressing Rising Retirements and Vacancies: Frequent judicial retirements create vacancies that affect the Court’s functioning and increase pressure on existing judges.
- The Supreme Court currently has vacancies and several judges are scheduled to retire during 2026.
Click to Know UPSC Offline Courses
Conclusion
Increasing the Supreme Court’s judge strength is essential for reducing pendency, improving judicial efficiency, and strengthening citizens’ access to timely justice.