Peasant Movements in Colonial India: Struggles Against Exploitation and Colonial Oppression

The history of peasant movements in India reflects a continuous struggle against oppression and exploitation during the colonial era. The agrarian society, which formed the backbone of India’s economy, suffered under British policies that disrupted traditional systems, introduced exploitative land revenue mechanisms, and prioritized cash crops over subsistence farming. These policies led to the rise of peasant movements, marked by discontent against landlords, moneylenders, and the colonial administration.

Peasant movements in India can be broadly classified into two phases: movements before 1857, which were localized and unorganized, and those after 1857, which displayed increased political awareness and better organization. These uprisings, though often suppressed, were significant milestones in India’s freedom struggle, showcasing the resilience of India’s rural populace.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course 

Peasant Movements Before 1857

The Sanyasi Revolt (1763–1800)

• Background: This movement, led by wandering ascetics known as sanyasis, combined spirituality with resistance against British exploitation in Bengal.
• Key Leaders: Majnum Shah, Chirag Ali, Musa Shah, Bhawani Pathak, and Debi Chaudhurani played pivotal roles.
• Causes: The famine of 1770, which devastated Bengal’s economy.
  • Introduction of exploitative land revenue policies by the British.
  • Socio-religious discontent among the population.
• Nature of Revolt: The sanyasis engaged in guerrilla warfare, targeting British revenue centers and symbols of authority.
• Impact: Despite suppression, it left a lasting legacy of resistance.
  • It inspired cultural representations, including in literature and folklore.

Narkelberia Uprising (1782–1831)

• Leader: Mir Nithar Ali, popularly known as Titu Mir, spearheaded the movement in Bengal.
• Causes: Beard tax imposed by Hindu landlords on Muslim tenants, particularly the Faraizis.
  • Economic and religious grievances of the peasantry.
• Nature of Uprising: Titu Mir organized armed resistance against landlords and the British.
  • The revolt later merged with the Wahhabi Movement, emphasizing Islamic reform and opposition to foreign domination.

Pagal Panthis (1825–1835)

• Background: A semi-religious group of Hajong and Garo tribes in Bengal, led by Karam Shah and later his son Tipu.
• Key Actions: Refused to pay exorbitant rents.
  • Attacked zamindars’ houses to protest exploitation.
• Outcome: The colonial government introduced land reforms to address the grievances of the Pagal Panthis.

Faraizi Revolt (1838–1857)

• Leader: Haji Shariatullah mobilized Muslim peasants in Eastern Bengal.
• Objectives: Promote adherence to Islamic principles and oppose un-Islamic practices.
  • Challenge the exploitation by zamindars and British authorities.
• Key Features: Encouraged tenants to refuse unjust taxes.
  • Acted as a moral and religious reform movement, strengthening community bonds.
• Impact: The British viewed the Faraizi Movement as a threat and suppressed it violently.

Moplah Uprisings (1836–1854)

• Region: Malabar, Kerala.
• Causes: Increased revenue demands and reduction in field sizes.
  • Exploitation by landlords, who were predominantly Hindu, over tenant Moplah peasants.
• Nature of Rebellion: Twenty-two uprisings occurred over nearly two decades, driven by economic and religious discontent.
• Outcome: Despite their persistence, the Moplahs could not secure significant concessions from the colonial administration.

Weaknesses of 19th Century Peasant Movements

• Lack of Awareness: Movements lacked a comprehensive understanding of the colonial economic structure.
• Traditional Framework: They operated within the existing societal norms without envisioning a new social order.
• Absence of Organization: Movements were localized and lacked long-term strategies or cohesive leadership.

Peasant Movements After 1857

The mutiny of 1857 transformed India’s agrarian revolts, giving them a sharper focus on economic grievances and fostering political awareness. Movements in this phase were often better organized and targeted landlords, moneylenders, and colonial policies.

The Indigo Revolt (1859–1860)

• Region: Bengal.
• Causes: Forced cultivation of indigo by European planters.
  • Fraudulent contracts and below-market prices for indigo crops.
  • Use of violence and intimidation by planters.
• Leadership: Digambar Biswas and Bishnu Biswas led the revolt.
• Nature of Revolt: Peasants refused advances and boycotted indigo cultivation.
  • Resorted to legal action and organized collective resistance.
• Impact: The government set up an Indigo Commission, which declared forced indigo cultivation illegal.
  • Indigo cultivation in Bengal declined significantly.

Pabna Agrarian Leagues (1870s–1880s)

• Region: Eastern Bengal.
• Causes: Enhanced rents and denial of occupancy rights.
  • Forcible evictions and legal harassment by zamindars.
• Nature of Movement: Peasants formed agrarian leagues and organized rent strikes.
  • Raised funds for legal battles against zamindars.
• Impact: The movement led to the passage of the Bengal Tenancy Act (1885), which granted peasants some occupancy rights.

Deccan Riots (1875)

• Region: Maharashtra.
• Causes: Crash in cotton prices after the American Civil War.
  • Heavy taxation under the Ryotwari system.
  • Exploitation by moneylenders, often outsiders.
• Nature of Riots: Social boycott of moneylenders escalated into agrarian riots.
  • Peasants seized and destroyed debt bonds.
• Impact: The Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act (1879) aimed to regulate money lending practices.

The Bijolia Movement (1897–1941)

• Region: Mewar, Rajasthan.
• Causes: Oppressive land revenue demands by jagirdars.
• Phases: 1897–1915: Initial protests led by Fateh Karan Charan.
  • 1915–1923: Escalation under Sadhu Sitaram Das and Vijay Singh Pathik.
  • 1923–1941: Culmination under Manikyalal Verma.
• Impact: The movement highlighted the plight of Rajasthan’s peasants and contributed to larger agrarian reforms.

Nature and Significance of Peasant Movements After 1857

• Economic Focus: Movements aimed at addressing economic exploitation rather than directly targeting colonial rule.
• Legal Awareness: Peasants increasingly used the legal system to assert their rights.
• Localized Reach: While effective, the movements were often limited to specific regions.
• Political Awakening: These uprisings laid the groundwork for integrating peasants into the larger nationalist movement.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course 

Conclusion

The peasant movements of colonial India were a testament to the resilience and determination of rural communities. While initially localized and spontaneous, these movements gradually evolved to address broader socio-economic issues, paving the way for significant reforms. From the Sanyasi Revolt to the Bijolia Movement, each uprising contributed to the larger narrative of resistance against colonial oppression.

The struggles of the peasants not only challenged the exploitative structures of colonial rule but also sowed the seeds for agrarian reforms in independent India. Their legacy underscores the importance of collective action and resilience in the face of injustice, providing valuable lessons for contemporary movements advocating for social and economic justice.

Sign up for the PWOnlyIAS Online Course by Physics Wallah and start your journey to IAS success today!

DOWNLOAD PDF