The Role and Challenges of Pressure Groups – (Part 02)

Pressure groups, also known as interest groups or advocacy groups, are voluntary organizations that seek to influence government policy or legislation without seeking formal political office. They represent a variety of interests and beliefs, acting as intermediaries between the government and their members. By focusing on specific issues, they aim to protect and promote the interests of their members, playing a crucial role in articulating these interests to decision-makers.

The Role, Impact, and Challenges of Pressure Groups in Democracy and Governance

Role of Pressure Groups in Strengthening Democracy

• Interest articulation: Pressure groups bring the demands and needs of the people to the decision-makers. 
  • Example: the India Against Corruption group in 2012 brought the issue of corruption of people to lawmakers leading to the enactment of the Lokpal act. 
• Encourage legislators: They use their size and motivation to push legislators to pass and implement laws that uphold the interest groups’ beliefs. 
  • Example: FICCI advocated for removing obsolete laws. 
• Act as agents of political socialisation: Interest Groups educate the masses on issues and also tend to change the status quo for the future. These groups play a vital role as two-way communication links between the citizen and the government. 
  • Example: Harijan Sevak Sangh was a pioneer in educating the people during the temple entry movement.
• Pressure groups as Feedback Mechanism for Improved Governance: They are actively involved in coordination with administrators for better implementation of the policy. the government consults them for policy formulation or amendment. This ensures 4Ds (Debate-Discussion-Deliberation-Dissention). 
  • Example: The Lawyers Association in Assam is helping people who have not found their name in the National Registration of Citizens (NRC) by working with the officers in a foreign tribunal. 
• As facilitators of a Progressive Society: They provide a safety valve outlet for collective grievance and ensure social change. 
  • Example: “Akshara” a Mumbai-based Pressure Group is lobbying against sexist lyrics in Bollywood movies; this has lit a spark in the film industry where many singers have stepped back from singing such songs. 
• Improve Accountability: They complement the work of opposition political parties by exposing the bad policies and wrongdoings of the government. 
  • Thereby improving the accountability of decision-makers to electorates.

• Representation of Diverse Interests: Pressure groups often represent the interests of specific communities, professions, or causes, providing a platform for diverse voices that may not be adequately addressed by political parties. 
  • Many pressure groups advocate for better and more fair representation of minorities and vulnerable sections of society.
  • Example: In Manipur, groups like Just Peace and Meira Paibis are trying to highlight genuine concerns associated with AFSPA. 
  • Groups like SEWA and NCW campaigned for the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, acting as advocates of women’s rights.
• Act as ‘Reservoirs of Leadership’: Pressure groups act as springboards for launching political careers. 
  • Example: India Against Corruption acted as a launchpad for Aam Aadmi Party.

Shortcomings of Pressure Groups 

• Pluralism and Chaos: Different pressure groups have different ideologies and sometimes collide and an unconscious tug of war prevails in the society. For example, 
  • FICCI’s push towards an easy hire and fire policy and trade unions asking for the promotion of unionism.
  • The blockade at the Haryana-Delhi highway paralyzed almost all Delhi supplies. 
• Increased Socio-political Crimes: It promotes crony capitalism, where they control the state policies. 
  • The liberalising of the Electoral bond in favour of the corporate-government nexus symbolises this unholy union.  
  • It promotes vote bank politics thus weakening the social fabric of the society. 
• Failure in Organisational Structure: They are semi-formal and fail to act as a secondary body to the government. There is no well-developed infrastructure, and leaders of the group are often found hopping into mainstream politics. 
• Narrow Selfish Interests: Unlike the pressure groups in the developed countries of the West, where these are invariably organised to safeguard social, economic and cultural interests, etc. in India these groups are organised around regional, religious and ethnic issues giving rise to secessionist tendencies at times.
• Increased Inequality: Pressure groups associated with the majority and wealthy individuals often succeed in persuading governments, which further widens the inequality gap. 
  • Example: The promotion of buying food grains directly from farmers is viewed as a corporate lobby that can widen the gap between the rich and the petty bourgeoisie. 
• Short-Lived: Many of the groups have a very short life because of the lack of resources, leading to a trust deficit. They often resort to unconstitutional means. 
  • The existence of anomic groups itself serves as  proof of unawareness of constitutional rights among people.
  • Example: the Naxalite movement started in 1967 in West Bengal.

Critical Evaluation of Pressure Groups

• Lack of Commitment: They are unstable and lack commitment thus their loyalties shift with political situations which threaten the general welfare.
• Misuse of Power: Instead of the pressure groups exerting influence on the political process, they become tools and implements to subserve political interests.
• Instability: Many pressure groups lack autonomous existence; they are transient and lack commitment, with their allegiances shifting based on political situations, posing a threat to the general welfare.
• Lack of Transparency: Some pressure groups may operate with limited transparency regarding their funding sources and activities, raising concerns about accountability and ethical practices.
• Potential for Corruption: There is a risk that pressure groups with significant financial backing may engage in undue influence, potentially leading to corruption or the manipulation of policies to serve narrow interests.
• Exclusivity: Some pressure groups may only represent specific segments of the population, excluding other voices and contributing to a fragmented political landscape.

Comparison between Developed and Developing Countries Pressure Group

Pressure groups in developed and developed countries are different in many ways. These differences can be better understood with relevant examples and data.

These distinctions underscore how cultural, political, and economic contexts mold the nature and functioning of pressure groups across various nations. The examples and data demonstrate a divergence in organization, methods, influence, and regulation between the scenarios in developing countries like India and developed countries.

Conclusion

Pressure groups are essential for the democratic process in a complex society like India, providing individuals with the organizational capacity and bargaining power to protect and promote their interests. 

• While they are indispensable for inclusive policymaking, it is important for the government to establish regulations that ensure these groups contribute positively and transparently to the political landscape.

DOWNLOAD PDF